Cited by 3Metallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryHistorical Studies in Central America

Contribution à l'étude de la métallurgie précolombienne de la province d'esmeraldas (equateur)

Open access
Reichlen, Henry·1942·Journal De La Société Des Américanistes

Abstract

Reichlen Henry. Contribution à l'étude de la métallurgie précolombienne de la Province d'Esmeraldas (Equateur).. In: Journal de la Société des Américanistes. Tome 34, 1942. pp. 201-228.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/jsa.1942.2336

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichlen, H.
Corresponding author
Reichlen, Henry
Venue
Journal De La Société Des Américanistes
Published
1942
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
201-228
ISSN
0037-9174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326246631
Cited by
3
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal de la Société des Américanistes (publishedVersion)
  • Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
Keywords
pre-Columbian metallurgy, Esmeraldas province, Andean archaeology, metalworking, goldsmithing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review