Cited by 60Technology Adoption and User BehaviourElectronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Information technology acceptance in health information management

Abdekhoda, M., Dehnad, A., Hosseini, A. F., Ahmadi, M.·2014·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: User acceptance of information technology has been a significant area of research for more than two decades in the field of information technology. This study assessed the acceptance of information technology in the context of Health Information Management (HIM) by utilizing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) which was modified and applied to assess user acceptance of health information technology as well as viability of TAM as a research construct in the context of HIM. METHODS: This was a descriptive- analytical study in which a sample of 187 personnel from a population of 363 personnel, working in medical records departments of hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, was selected. Users' perception of applying information technology was studied by a researcher-developed questionnaire. Collected data were analyzed by SPSS software (version16) using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. RESULTS: The results suggest that TAM is a useful construct to assess user acceptance of information technology in the context of HIM. The findings also evidenced the perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PE) were positively associated with favorable users' attitudes towards HIM. PU was relatively more associated (r= 0.22, p = 0.05) than PEOU (r = 0.014, p = 0.05) with favorable user attitudes towards HIM. CONCLUSIONS: Users' perception of usefulness and ease of use are important determinants providing the incentive for users to accept information technologies when the application of a successful HIM system is attempted. The findings of the present study suggest that user acceptance is a key element and should subsequently be the major concern of health organizations and health policy makers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3414/me13-01-0079

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TTF has been useful in predicting user acceptance and adoption of technologies and in identifying potential barriers to adoption.

    “It has been useful in predicting user acceptance and adoption of technologies and in identifying potential barriers to adoption that can be addressed to facilitate a successful implementation (Abdekhoda et al., 2014; Taherdoost, 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]6. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance a mong physicians. Medical Care Research and Review2007; 64 (6): 650 - 672.
  2. [9]9. Malcolm CL. Five e-business strategies you can take to the bank. Healthcare financial management. Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 2001; 55 (9): 72.
  3. [29]29. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1992; 22 (14): 1111-1132.
  4. [39]39. Chen YC, Shang RN, Ho TY, Hesieh SC. The behavioral intention to use e systems for employees in Public Utility Company: Analysis based on TAM and TTF. J E Bus 2008; 10 (1): 305 -327.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdekhoda, M., Dehnad, A., Hosseini, A. F., & Ahmadi, M.
Affiliations
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Ahmadi, M.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2014
Volume
53
Issue
01
Pages
14-20
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W1985534934
Cited by
60
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technology acceptance, health information management, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, user attitudes, medical records department, health information technology, user acceptance
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Hospitals, University, Iran, Medical Informatics, Medical Records Department, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Electronic Health Records, Health Information Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review