Cited by 55demographic modeling and climate adaptationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and Management

Dynamic microsimulation of health care demand, health care finance and the economic impact of health behaviours: survey and review

Open access
Spielauer, Martin·2007·International Journal of Microsimulation

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper reviews the issues to be faced in attempting to create a microsimulation of health care demand, health care finance and the economic impact of health behaviour. These issues identified via an in-depth review of seven dynamic microsimulation models, selected from an initial set of 27 models in order to highlight the main differences in approaches and modelling options currently adopted. After presenting a brief description of each of the seven selected models, the main modelling approaches are summarized and critically appraised using five main distinguishing criteria. These criteria are the use of alignment techniques, model complexity (as reflected in the range of variables used), theoretical foundations, type of starting population, and the extent and detail of financial issues covered. Building upon this appraisal, the paper goes on to show how the ‘12 SAGE lessons ’ apply in the field of health care microsimulation. The trade-off between complexity and predictive power is shown to be key. Finally an appendix summarises the main features of all 27 of the dynamic microsimulation models originally surveyed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.34196/ijm.00005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cohort and individual-based state-transition frameworks focused on in this report do not capture interactions, model a single closed cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.

    “These frameworks do not capture interactions, model a single (closed) cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.”

    From State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3 (2012) · cites this paper as [9]

    Section 3.4 (page unavailable) says discrete-time models typically use transition tables, which supports the point about transitions at specified intervals for that class of models. The paper does not establish that the cohort and individual-based frameworks in the claim lack interactions or model a single closed cohort; Section 2.4 instead describes a LifePaths simulation made up of multiple cases. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spielauer, M.
Affiliations
Statistics Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Spielauer, Martin
Venue
International Journal of Microsimulation
Published
2007
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
35-53
OpenAlex
W1579478200
Cited by
55
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › demographic modeling and climate adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
dynamic microsimulation, health care demand, health care financing, health behavior, model complexity, predictive power, alignment techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review