Cited by 17Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Multi-scale Fusion Model Based on Gated Recurrent Unit for Enhancing Prediction Accuracy of State-of-charge in Battery Energy Storage Systems

Open access
Liu, Hao, Liang, Fengwei, Hu, Tianyu, Hong, Jichao, Ma, Huimin·2024·Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the state-of-charge (SOC) of battery energy storage system (BESS) is critical for its safety and lifespan in electric vehicles. To overcome the imbalance of existing methods between multi-scale feature fusion and global feature extraction, this paper introduces a novel multi-scale fusion (MSF) model based on gated recurrent unit (GRU), which is specifically designed for complex multi-step SOC prediction in practical BESSs. Pearson correlation analysis is first employed to identify SOC-related parameters. These parameters are then input into a multi-layer GRU for point-wise feature extraction. Concurrently, the parameters undergo patching before entering a dual-stage multi-layer GRU, thus enabling the model to capture nuanced information across varying time intervals. Ultimately, by means of adaptive weight fusion and a fully connected network, multi-step SOC predictions are rendered. Following extensive validation over multiple days, it is illustrated that the proposed model achieves an absolute error of less than 1.5% in real-time SOC prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.35833/mpce.2023.000726

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [91] identified six key variables strongly correlated with SOC through Pearson correlation analysis on real-world driving data, then adaptively combined these features using dynamic weights before inputting them into the GRU network.

    “identified six key variables strongly correlated with SOC through Pearson correlation analysis on real-world driving data, then adaptively combined these features using dynamic weights before inputting them into the GRU network[91].”

    From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    Section C (Pearson Correlation Analysis) identifies six SOC-related input variables from driving and parked-charging data. Section 4 (Adaptive fusion method) shows that GRUs process those inputs first; learnable weights then fuse the GRU-generated feature representations before a fully connected prediction head. The claimed order—weighted fusion before GRU input—is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This approach effectively predicts the SOC of EV batteries within 1-5 min, achieving an RMSE error lower than that of the Transformer and the PatchTST network.

    “This approach effectively predicts the SOC of EV batteries within 1-5 min, achieving an RMSE error lower than that of the Transformer and the PatchTST network - the top performers in standard time-series tasks.”
  • ML methods for feature extraction from raw input data are highly effective, with some methods even surpassing Transformer models and top implementations such as PatchTST in time series prediction.

    “First, ML methods for feature extraction from raw input data are highly effective[90,91,103], with some methods even surpassing[91] Transformer models and top implementations such as PatchTST in time series prediction.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. L. Wu, H. Pang, Y. Geng et al., "Low-complexity state of charge and anode potential prediction for lithium-ion batteries using a simplified electrochemical model-based observer under variable load condition," International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 11834- 11848, Apr. 2022.
  2. Y. Zhang and J. Yan, "Crossformer: transformer utilizing cross-dimen- sion dependency for multivariate time series forecasting," in Proceed- ings of The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, Kigali, Rwanda, May 2023, pp. 1-21.
  3. Jichao Hong received the Ph.D. degree in automotive engineering from the Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2020. He is currently an Associate Professor with the School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. He is the Director of IEEE PES China Electric Vehicle Technical Committee Power Battery Tech- nology Sub-Committee, and a Senior Member of the Youth Working Com- mittee of Chinese Electrotechnical Society. His research interests include new energy power system, big data mining analysis, and intelligent safety control.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Liang, F., Hu, T., Hong, J., & Ma, H.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Venue
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
Published
2024
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
405-414
ISSN
  • 2196-5420 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-5625
OpenAlex
W4393205853
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
state of charge estimation, battery energy storage, gated recurrent unit, multi-scale feature fusion, multi-step forecasting, electric vehicles, adaptive weight fusion, feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review