Cited by 123Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStudent Stress and CopingStress and Burnout Research

Resilience, stress, and coping among Canadian medical students

Open access
Rahimi, Behruz, Baetz, Marilyn, Bowen, Rudy, Balbuena, Lloyd·2014·Canadian Medical Education Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have established that medical school is a stressful place but coping styles and resilience have not been adequately addressed as protective factors. METHOD: Using a cross-sectional design, 155 students were surveyed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and the Canadian Community Health Survey Coping Scale. Mean scores were compared by gender and between our sample and normative scores using t-tests. Multivariate linear regression was performed to examine whether stress levels were related to coping and resilience. RESULTS: Medical students had higher perceived stress, negative coping, and lower resilience than age and gender-matched peers in the general population. Male medical students had higher positive coping scores than general population peers and higher resilience, and lower perceived stress than female medical students. Coping scores did not vary by gender in our sample. The multivariate model showed that resilience and negative, but not positive coping, predicted stress. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are neither more resilient nor better equipped with coping skills than peers in the population. Greater emphasis on self-care among medical trainees is recommended. Emphasizing the importance of self-care during medical training, whether by formal incorporation into the curriculum or informal mentorship, deserves further study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36834/cmej.36689

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burnout prevalence in healthcare settings is significantly higher than in the general population.

    “a significantly higher rate compared to the general population (4–6).”

    From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (page not available) says about half of medical trainees experience burnout symptoms. The Results (page not available) find significantly higher perceived stress among medical students than among general-population peers. The paper does not establish that burnout prevalence is significantly higher than in the general population, or extend that comparison to healthcare settings generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies demonstrate that resilience impacts mental health, including stress management and prevention of burnout.

    “Several studies demonstrate the impact of resilience on mental health, showcasing its role in stress management and the prevention of burnout (3, 6, 15–19).”

    From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results report that resilience was inversely associated with perceived stress among Canadian medical students, supporting the stress-management part of the claim. The paper does not test whether resilience prevents burnout; burnout appears as background in the Introduction and in a reference title. Its observational association also does not demonstrate a causal impact on mental health. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahimi, B., Baetz, M., Bowen, R., & Balbuena, L.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Venue
Canadian Medical Education Journal
Published
2014-12-17
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e5-e12
ISSN
1923-1202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1507552269
Cited by
123
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Education Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
resilience, perceived stress, coping, medical students, medical education, gender differences, self-care, protective factors, negative coping, positive coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review