Cited by 1,226Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStudent Stress and CopingInnovations in Medical Education

Stress and depression among medical students: a cross-sectional study

Dahlin, Marie, Joneborg, Nils, Runeson, Bo·2005·Medical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the exposure to different stressors and the prevalence of depression among medical students at different levels of education, taking gender differences into account. DESIGN: Students were asked to complete a new stress inventory called the Higher Education Stress Inventory (HESI), the Major Depression Inventory (MDI), slightly modified, and questions on suicidal ideation developed by Meehan. SETTING: The study was carried out at the Karolinska Institute Medical University, Stockholm, Sweden. Matched controls from the general population were used. PARTICIPANTS: All registered students in Years 1, 3 and 6 were enrolled in the study (n = 342). The response rate was 90.4%. RESULTS: Year 1 students gave high ratings to the workload and lack of feedback stressors. Year 3 students gave high ratings to 'Worries about future endurance/competence' and 'Pedagogical shortcomings'. In Year 6, both the latter factors were rated highly, but Year 6 students also gave higher ratings than the 2 other groups to 'Non-supportive climate'. In all 3 cohorts students complained of lack of feedback. Female students gave higher ratings than males to 4 out of 7 factors. Several stress factors were identified as being associated with depression. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among students was 12.9%, significantly higher than in the general population, and was 16.1% among female students versus 8.1% among males. A total of 2.7% of students had made suicide attempts, but none during the previous year. CONCLUSION: Year 1 students indicated experiencing the highest degree of pressure from studies. A gender difference regarding stress levels was also seen, where women reported higher levels of stress than men. Medical students had higher depression rates than the general population, and women students had higher rates than men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahlin, M., Joneborg, N., & Runeson, B.
Affiliations
Saint Göran Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Dahlin, Marie
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-17
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
594-604
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2095424375
Cited by
1,226
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 53
FWCI
33.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
medical students, stress, depression, depressive symptoms, stressors, workload, lack of feedback, gender differences, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, Major Depression Inventory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review