The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pausing to consider why a headline is true or false can help reduce the sharing of false news
Open accessAbstract
In an online experiment, participants who paused to explain why a headline was true or false indicated that they were less likely to share false information compared to control participants. Their intention to share accurate news stories was unchanged. These results indicate that adding “friction” (i.e., pausing to think) before sharing can improve the quality of information shared on social media.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, because real (unaltered or authentic) materials are used and re-contextualized in a deceptive manner, they are difficult to detect and flag as disinformation (e.g., Fazio, 2020).”
From How persuasive are political cheapfakes disseminated via social media? The effects of out-of-context visual disinformation on message credibility and issue agreement (2025) · cites this paper as Fazio, 2020
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences
Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z · Cited by 2,122
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,580
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268
The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 · Cited by 1,032
The structure and function of explanations
Lombrozo, T. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004 · Cited by 693
Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000098 · Cited by 598
Self-citationFake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000729 · Cited by 593
Mosleh, M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228882 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–188 of 188
Capraro, V., & Celadin, T. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/s3q5n · Cited by 7
Exploring the effectiveness of virtual reality in combating misinformation on climate change
Erişen, E., Yildirim, F., Duran, E., Şar, B., & Kalkan, I. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13057 · Cited by 7
O’Mahony, C., Murphy, G., & Linehan, C. (2024) · advances in/psychology · doi:10.56296/aip00030 · Cited by 6
Exoskeleton for the Mind: Exploring Strategies Against Misinformation with a Metacognitive Agent
Kim, Y., Ueno, T., Seaborn, K., Oura, H., Urakami, J., & Sawa, Y. (2023) · Augmented Humans International Conference (AHs) · doi:10.1145/3582700.3582725 · Cited by 8
The Social Media Context Interferes with Truth DiscernmentPreprint
Epstein, Z. G., Sirlin, N., Arechar, A. A., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q4bd2 · Cited by 6
Friction Interventions to Curb the Spread of Misinformation on Social MediaPreprint
Jahn, L., Rendsvig, R. K., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Hendricks, V. F. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.11498 · Cited by 6
Scales, D. A., Hurth, L., Xi, W., Gorman, S. E., Radhakrishnan, M., Windham, S., Akunne, A., Florman, J., Leininger, L. J., & Gorman, J. M. (2023) · JMIR Infodemiology · doi:10.2196/50138 · Cited by 5
Orosz, G., Faragó, L., Paskuj, B., Rakovics, Z., Sam-Mine, D., Audemard, G., Modeliar, M. S., & Krekó, P. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-61232-x · Cited by 5
The Currency of the Attentional Economy: The Uses and Abuses of Attention in Our World
Schoenherr, J. R. (2022) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2022.3147541 · Cited by 5
Orosz, G., Faragó, L., Paskuj, B., & Krekó, P. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2159993/v1 · Cited by 5
A Bayesian decision-theoretic framework for studying motivated reasoningPreprint
Priniski, J. H., Solanki, P., & Horne, Z. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ngavz · Cited by 7
Verba Volant, Scripta Volant: Understanding Post-publication Title Changes in News Outlets
Guo, X.-Z., Kondracki, B., Nikiforakis, N., & Skiena, S. (2022) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512219 · Cited by 9
Accuracy-sensitisation promotes the sharing of pro- (but not anti-) vaccine information
Saling, L. L., Phillips, J. G., & Cohen, D. B. (2023) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2023.2179053 · Cited by 4
Nudging accurate scientific communication
Allard, A., & Clavien, C. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290225 · Cited by 5
Teaching epistemic integrity to promote reliable scientific communication
Allard, A., & Clavien, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308304 · Cited by 6
Recognizing the Role of Psychological Science in Improving Online Spaces
Fazio, L. K. (2020) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100620972100 · Cited by 4
Self-citationJohnson, S. S. (2022) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171211070957a · Cited by 8
Friction Against Fiction: Adding 'Grit' to Boost Psychological Inoculation Against MisinformationPreprint
Fendt, M., Holford, D. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dzbm7 · Cited by 4
The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale
Dash, S., Xu, Y., Jalbert, M. C., & Spiro, E. S. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf207 · Cited by 6
Ryguła, R., Piksa, M., & Cieslik-Starkiewicz, A. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106339 · Cited by 4
A perspective on friction interventions to curb the spread of misinformation
Jahn, L., Rendsvig, R. K., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Hendricks, V. F. (2025) · npj Complexity · doi:10.1038/s44260-025-00051-1 · Cited by 19
Students Rate the Credibility of Climate Change Information
Zilz, K., & Höttecke, D. (2025) · Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-025-00692-7 · Cited by 3
Kaňková, J., & Matthes, J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108896 · Cited by 4
Sude, D. J., Sharon, G., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242865 · Cited by 3
Hägle, O., Escher, S., Heil, R., & Jahnel, J. (2024) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.420 · Cited by 3
Procesamiento cognitivo de fake news políticas. Revisión de estudios experimentales
García, A. P. P., Danieli, N. E., & Freire, I. E. M. (2023) · Dixit · doi:10.22235/d.v37i1.3112 · Cited by 2
Manipulating the Online Marketplace of IdeasPreprint
Lou, X., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Gurgun, S., Cemiloglu, D., Arden-Close, E. J., Phalp, K. T., Ali, R., & Nakov, P. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4600006 · Cited by 3
Moral education and the psychology of moral discourse
Heinzelmann, N. C. (2025) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2025.2453687 · Cited by 4
Dahlke, R., Tu, F., Wang, Y.-C., Lu, Y., Engeda, B. W., & Hancock, J. T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757571 · Cited by 2
From likes to trusts: How trust feedback reduces misinformation on social media
Ceylan, G., & Wood, W. (2026) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1177/23794607261423714 · Cited by 2
Ogbodo, J. N., Onwe, E. C., Nwankwo, S. U., & Ewa-Ibe, B. (2023) · African Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/23743670.2024.2329701 · Cited by 6
Cultivating Essential Capacities for Moral Resilience
Rushton, C. H., Kaszniak, A. W., & Halifax, J. S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197667149.003.0008 · Cited by 2
Can Education Save Us From Ourselves? Three Psychological Challenges to Democracy
Clark, C. H., & Schmeichel, M. (2024) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543241288245 · Cited by 4
Designing for affective warnings & cautions to protect against online misinformation threats
Carroll, F., & Bonkel, B. (2021) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2021.11 · Cited by 2
Baum, J., Frömer, R., & Rahman, R. A. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3zr24 · Cited by 2
Neyazi, T. A., Ng, A. Y. K., Kuru, O., & Muhtadi, B. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/38c5w · Cited by 2
van der Puil, R., Spahn, A., & Royakkers, L. M. M. (2023) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/ijt.331800 · Cited by 1
Santángelo, A. P., & Solovey, G. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47939-3 · Cited by 1
Udry, J., & Barber, S. J. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106275 · Cited by 1
The cognitive and social dynamics of social correction of misinformation: a scoping review
Vithanage, S. S., Ransom, K., Mendoza, A., & Karunasekera, S. A. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2651115 · Cited by 1
The structural fingerprints of disinformation: a content-agnostic framework
Redaelli, S., Spitale, G., & Germani, F. (2026) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09886-7 · Cited by 2
Scudo, F. L. (2023) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31469-8_2 · Cited by 1
The Reasoning behind Fake News Assessments: A Linguistic Analysis
Manikonda, L., Nevo, D., Horne, B. D., Arrington, C., & Adalı, S. (2022) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00168 · Cited by 1
Young and Miller, Political Communication in Oxford Handbook of Poli Psych 3rd edPreprint
Young, D. G. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/mwdtu · Cited by 1
What if becoming information literate were an adventure?
Dahl, T. I. (2022) · Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education · doi:10.15845/noril.v13i1.3778
Ospina, J. P., Orosz, G., & Spencer, S. J. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/x7qe5
Listening to Crowdsourced Fact-CheckingPreprint
Panizza, F., Ronzani, P., Martini, C., Mattavelli, S., & Morisseau, T. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4339853
Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Manipulation TacticsPreprint
Truong, B. T., Lou, X., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3011774/v1
Are conspiracy theorists inaccurate, unmotivated to be accurate, or both?: A latent class analysis
Bowes, S. M., & Fazio, L. K. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17928.1
Self-citationMisinformation, Paradox, and Heuristics: An Algorithmic Nudge to Counter Misinformation
Shin, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52569-8_4
Pause before action: Waiting short time as a simple and resource-rational boost
Shirasuna, M., Kagawa, R., & Honda, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87119-z · Cited by 1
Partisanship and its effects on metacognitive effort, agreement, and misinformation detection
Jackson, D. L., & Hoewe, J. (2025) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2025.2472827
Development of the ability to assess (fake) news about ecology from adolescence to older adults
Cassotti, M., Stanc, L. L., Ozkalp-Poincloux, B., César, C., Lemaire, M., Berthet, E. T. A., Borst, G., & Salvia, É. (2025) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/01650254251340924 · Cited by 3
Observed Correction Increases Accuracy
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0003
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0005
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.002.0006
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0009
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0008
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0007
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0001
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.002.0009
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0004
The Theory of Observed Correction
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0002
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0006
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.003.0010
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.002.0007
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.002.0004
7 ways to avoid becoming a misinformation superspreader when the news is shocking
Sinclair, H. (2021) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/aai.aq5w3xpne
Grit in the Information Machine: Library Professionalism in a World Without Friction
Freeburg, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1429
Glaubwürdigkeitsurteile zu medialen Repräsentationen des Klimawandels
Zilz, K., & Höttecke, D. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48374-6_18
Nudges to Reduce the Spread of Online Disinformation: A Comparison with the Educational Effect
Suzuki, H. N., & Inaba, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4674-9_26
Calvillo, D. P., & Smelter, T. J. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13199266
Additional file 1 of Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13065598
TrueAI: An AI-Enhanced Intervention to Prevent Fake News Spread Among older adults on Social Media
Zhou, L., Guan, X., & Liu, P. (2025) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3715070.3749243
Beyond the Virus: The Pandemic of False Memories
Sanz, A. A., & Migueles, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03895-1_6
Frictional memory: The afterlives of lynching in the digital public spheres
Vasudeva, F., Azizifard, N., & Eetu Mäkelä, A. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261416894 · Cited by 1
Opuni, F. F., Doe, J. K., Akaab, I. I., Amegbe, H., & Asiedu, K. A. (2026) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13388-5_20
Understanding misinformation and fighting for information
Altay, S. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2e02b9cfz3b17z4c05za865zfcbe3a9fb6e4
Dickie, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9621783/v1
Gao, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-026-09569-7
Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S., Ecker, U., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R., Ali, A., Bak-Coleman, J., Barzilai, S., Basol, M., et al. (2024) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Ramos, C., Jiménez-Cruz, C., & Hernández-Escayola, P. (2026) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-198
Liao, M., & Sundar, S. S. (2026) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmag012 · Cited by 3
Denner, N. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-46851-4_37-1
Why we believe chatbots: trust calibration as a design problem
Jaidka, K., & Cai, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1935527 · Cited by 1
Freeburg, D. (2026) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2026-0253
User Interface Designs to Address Cancer Misinformation
Lazard, A. J., Avendaño-Galdamez, M. I., Queen, T. L., Lake, S., Varma, T., Marshall, D., Tan, H.-J., Stein, J. N., & Dasgupta, N. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.41122
Metadata
- Authors
- Fazio, L.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fazio, Lisa
- ORCID
- Fazio, Lisa
- Venue
- Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- ISSN
- 2766-1652 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005166752
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- misinformation, social media, information quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review