Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of gastric cancer

Open access
Crew, Katherine D, Neugut, Alfred I·2006·World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

fallen dramatically over the past 70 years [1] .Despite its recent decline, gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [2,3] .In 2000, about 880 000 people were diagnosed with gastric cancer and approximately 650 000 died of the disease [4] .The two main tumor sites of gastric adenocarcinoma are proximal (cardia) and distal (noncardia).Despite a decline in distal gastric cancers, proximal tumors have been increasing in incidence since the 1970s, especially among males in the Western countries [5,6] .These gastric tumor types predominate in populations from different geographic locations, racial and socio-economic groups.They may also differ in genetic susceptibility, pathologic profile, clinical presentation, and prognosis.The observed differences between gastric cancers by anatomic site suggest that they are distinct diseases with different etiologies.Detailed epidemiological analyses of their demographic trends and risk factors will help guide future cancer control strategies. PATHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONSAbout 90% of stomach tumors are adenocarcinomas, which are subdivided into two main histologic types:( 1 ) we l l -d i f f e r e n t i a t e d o r i n t e s t i n a l t y p e, a n d ( 2 ) undifferentiated or diffuse type.The intestinal type is related to corpus-dominant gastritis with gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, whereas the diffuse type usually originates in pangastritis without atrophy.The intestinal type is more common in males, blacks, and older age groups, whereas the diffuse type has a more equal male-to-female ratio and is more frequent in younger individuals [7,8] .Intestinal type tumors predominate in highrisk geographic areas, such as East Asia, Eastern Europe, Central and South America, and account for much of the international variation of gastric cancer [9] .Diffuse type adenocarcinomas of the stomach have a more uniform geographic distribution [10] .A decline in the incidence of the intestinal type tumors in the corpus of the stomach accounts for most of the recent decrease in gastric cancer rates worldwide [11] .In contrast, the incidence of diffuse type gastric carcinoma, particularly the signet ring type, has been increasing [12] . DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS Time trendsIn the 1930s, gastric cancer was the most common cause of cancer death in US and Europe.During the past 70 years, mortality rates have fallen dramatically

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 217 references

Cited by

See all 2,108

Metadata

Authors
Crew, K. D., & Neugut, A. I.
Venue
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
354
ISSN
1007-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126532720
Cited by
2,108
References
217
FWCI
68.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354
The paper
Crew, K. D., & Neugut, A. I. (2006). Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.