The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression
Open accessAbstract
There has been a recent surge in the study of ensemble coding, the idea that the visual system represents a set of similar items using summary statistics (Alvarez & Oliva, 2008; Ariely, 2001; Chong & Treisman, 2003; Parkes, Lund, Angelucci, Solomon, & Morgan, 2001). We previously demonstrated that this ability extends to faces and thus requires a high level of object processing (Haberman & Whitney, 2007, 2009). Recent debate has centered on the nature of the summary representation of size (e.g., Myczek & Simons, 2008) and whether the perceived average simply reflects the sampling of a very small subset of the items in a set. In the present study, we explored this further in the context of faces, asking observers to judge the average expressions of sets of faces containing emotional outliers. Our results suggest that the visual system implicitly and unintentionally discounts the emotional outliers, thereby computing a summary representation that encompasses the vast majority of the information present. Additional computational modeling and behavioral results reveal that an intentional cognitive sampling strategy does not accurately capture observer performance. Observers derive precise ensemble information given a 250-msec exposure, suggesting a rapid and flexible system not bound by the limits of serial attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention
Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.172403899 · Cited by 1,155
Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03208840 · Cited by 733
Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision
Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/135062800394702 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003 · Cited by 586
Tracking the relation between gist and item memory over the course of long-term memory consolidation
Zeng, T., Tompary, A., Schapiro, A. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65588 · Cited by 40
Goldenberg, A. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231179154 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D.
- Venue
- Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2010-10-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1825-1838
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- OpenAlex
- W2150014447
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/app.72.7.1825
- The paper
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2010). The visual system discounts emotional deviants when extracting average expression. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.72.7.1825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.