CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Response selection involves executive control: evidence from the selective interference paradigm

Open access
Szmalec, Arnaud, Vandierendonck, André, Kemps, Eva·2005·Memory & Cognition
DOI 10.3758/bf03193069
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated whether response selection involves executive control, using the selective interference paradigm within Baddeley's (1986) working memory framework. The interference from response selection was estimated by comparing the patterns of dual-task interference of simple and choice RT tasks with those of a number of established working memory tasks. In Experiment 1, we compared impairment of forward and backward verbal serial recall from the RT tasks and articulatory suppression. Experiment 2 measured the adverse effects of the RT tasks and matrix tapping on forward and backward visuospatial serial recall. Finally, in Experiment 3, we examined the impairment from the RT tasks with two measures of executive control--namely, letter and category fluency. Altogether, the three experiments demonstrated that response selection interferes with executive control and that the interference is not produced at the level of working memory's slave systems, which supports the assumption of executive involvement in response selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03193069

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central executive network and the default mode network, both involving the dorsal prefrontal cortex, may be involved in the process of intentional suppression.

    “The central executive network (Szmalec et al., 2005) and the default mode network (Raichle and Snyder, 2007), both involving the dorsal prefrontal cortex, may be involved in this process.”

    From Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Szmalec et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Szmalec, A., Vandierendonck, A., & Kemps, E.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Szmalec, Arnaud
ORCID
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-04
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
531-541
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
DOI
10.3758/bf03193069
OpenAlex
W2045776945
Cited by
69
References
56
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit Gent
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
response selection, executive function, working memory, dual-task interference, serial recall, articulatory suppression, fluency, Baddeley's working memory model
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Reaction Time, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review