The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995) · User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/bf01099821 · Cited by 2,324
Self-citationYOU CAN'T PLAY 20 QUESTIONS WITH NATURE AND WIN: PROJECTIVE COMMENTS ON THE PAPERS OF THIS SYMPOSIUM
Newell, A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50012-3 · Cited by 820
“Learning factors analysis-a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement,”
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11774303_17 · Cited by 572
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., &Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor.Cognitive Science,26, 147–179. · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Anderson, J. R. (1990).The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling.Cognitive Science,26, 85–112. · DOI
- Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebière, C., &Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind.Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060. · DOI
- Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A. T., &Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring.Artificial Intelligence,42, 7–49. · DOI
- Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Farrell, R., &Reiser, B. J. (1987). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. In P. Morris (Ed.),Modelling cognition (pp. 93–133). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
- Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., &Corbett, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor.Cognitive Science,13, 467–505. · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., &Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned.Journal of the Learning Sciences,4, 167–207. · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, J. R., &Lebière, C. (1998).The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Corbett, A. T., &Anderson, J. R. (1995a). Knowledge decomposition and subgoal reification in the ACT programming tutor. In J. Greer (Ed.),Artificial intelligence and education, 1995: The proceedings of AI-ED 95 (pp. 469–476). Charlottesville, VA: AACE Press.
- Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., &Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.),Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849–874). Amsterdam: Elsevier. · DOI
- Corbett, A. [T.], McLaughlin, M., Scarpinatto, K. C., &Hadley, W. H. (2000). Analyzing and generating mathematical models: An Algebra II cognitive tutor design study. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. van Lehn (Eds.),Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Fifth international conference (pp. 314–323). Berlin: Springer. · DOI
- Corbett, A. T., Trask, H. J., Scarpinatto, K. C., &Hadley, W. S. (1998). A formative evaluation of the PACT Algebra II Tutor: Support for simple hierarchical reasoning. In B. P. Goettl, H. Halff, C. Redfield, & V. Shute (Eds.),Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Fourth International Conference, ITS ’98 (pp. 374–383). New York: Springer. · DOI
- Gluck, K. A. (1999). Eye movements and algebra tutoring.Dissertation Abstracts International,61, 1664B.
- Koedinger, K. R., &Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry.Cognitive Science,14, 511–550. · DOI · Paper page
- Koedinger, K. R., &Anderson, J. R. (1993). Effective use of intelligent software in high school math classrooms. InProceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 241–248). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Koedinger, K. R., &Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization.Interactive Learning Environments,5, 161–180. · DOI
- Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., &Mark, M. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,8, 30–43.
- Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., Ritter, S., & Shapiro, L. J. (2000).Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor: Summary research results. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Learning. Available at www.carnegielearning .com/web_docs/CMU_research_results.pdf.Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13, 129-164.Lebière, C. (1999). The dynamics of cognition: An ACT-R model of cognitive arithmetic.Kognitionswissenschaft,8, 5-19.
- Mark, M. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (1999). Strategic support of algebraic expression writing. InProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 149-158). Available at www.cs.usask.ca/UM99/Proc/mark.pdf. · DOI
- Morgan, P., &Ritter, S. (2002).An experimental study of the effects of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I on student knowledge and attitude. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Learning. Available at www.carnegielearning.com/web_docs/morgan_ritter_2002.pdf.
- Nathan, M. J., &Koedinger, K. R. (2000a). An investigation of teachers’ beliefs of students’ algebra development.Cognition & Instruction,18, 209–237. · DOI
- Nathan, M. J., &Koedinger, K. R. (2000b). Teachers’ and researchers’ beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,31, 168–190. · DOI
- National Research Council (2003).Strategic education research partnership (M. S. Donovan, A. K. Wigdor, & C. E. Snow, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Newell, A. (1990).Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ritter, S., &Anderson, J. R. (1995). Calculation and strategy in the equation solving tutor. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.),Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 413–418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., &Koedinger, K. R. (2002). Comparing instructional strategies for integrating conceptual and procedural knowledge. In D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajin, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.),Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapters of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 969–978). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., &Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Designing better learning environments: Knowledge scaffolding supports mathematical problem solving.Cognition & Instruction,23, 313–349. · DOI
- Rittle-Johnson, B., &Siegler, R. S. (1998). The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. In C. Donlan (Ed.),The development of mathematical skills: Studies in developmental psychology (pp. 75–110). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., &Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process.Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 346–362. · DOI · Paper page
- Sarkis, H. (2004).Cognitive Tutor Algebra 1 program evaluation: Miami-Dade County public schools. Lighthouse Point, FL: The Reliability Group. Available at www.carnegielearning.com/web_docs/sarkis_2004.pdf.
- Siegler, R. S., &Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development.American Psychologist,46, 606–620. · DOI · Paper page
- Siegler, R. S., &Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.),Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by
Social-Psychological Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311405999 · Cited by 1,345
Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges
Langley, P., Laird, J. E., & Rogers, S. (2009) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.07.004 · Cited by 728
Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale
Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2014) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713507480 · Cited by 317
Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education: a systematic review
Crompton, H., Jones, M. V., & Burke, D. (2024) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2121344 · Cited by 213
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_14 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-255
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W1971228271
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03194060
- The paper
- Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.