The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dual-task SRT procedure: Fine-tuning the timing
Abstract
In the standard sequential reaction time study, subjects are presented with a repeating sequence of targets to which they must respond as rapidly as possible. With practice reaction times decrease, suggesting a learned ability to exploit the repeating patterns in the display. In a common variation, a second task is interposed, typically a tone-counting task in which subjects must keep track of the frequency with which particular tones occur. In the canonical experiment, these tones appear at varying times in the interval between the subjects' response to a target and the next target. Data are presented that show that this latter variable (the RSOA, response-secondary stimulus onset asynchrony) actually plays an important but previously hidden role in these experiments. A model based on an extension of the notion of the psychological refractory period is introduced to explain these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hsiao and Reber (2001) systematically varied the occurrence of the tone within the response-stimulus interval and found the greatest interference late in this interval.
“Hsiao and Reber (2001) systematically varied the occurrence of the tone within the response-stimulus interval and found the greatest interference late in this interval.”
From The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity (2005) · cites this paper as Hsiao and Reber, 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.189 · Cited by 594 · cited 4×
“…used a short (83-msec) tone that began almost immediately (e.g., 17 msec) after the keypress response, but most of the studies (Cohen et al., 1990; Curran & Keele, 1993; Frensch, Buchner, & Lin, 1994, among many others) used a tone of often unspecified duration that was randomly presented either…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFrensch, P. A., Lin, J., & Buchner, A. (1998) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s004260050015 · Cited by 143
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Baldwin, K. B., &Kutas, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning.Psychophyiology,34, 74–86. · DOI
- Cleeremans, A. (1993).Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · DOI
- Cleeremans, A., &Jiménez, L. (1998). Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 323–364). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cleeremans, A., &McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 235–253. · DOI
- Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S.W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30. · DOI · Paper page
- Creamer, L.R. (1963). Event uncertainty, psychological refractory period, and human data processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,66, 187–194. · DOI
- Curran, T. (1998). Implicit sequence learning from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: What, how and where? In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 365–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Eimer, M., Goschke, R., Schlaghecken, F., &Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 970–987. · DOI
- Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., &Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transactions in the presence and absence of a distractor task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 567–584. · DOI
- Frensch, P.A., &Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.Memory & Cognition,22, 95–110. · DOI
- Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., &Ivry, R. [B.] (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences,7, 497–510. · DOI · Paper page
- Heuer, H., &Schmidtke, V. (1996). Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.Psychological Research,59, 176–186. · DOI
- Hsiao, A., &Reber, A. S. (1998). The role of attention in implicit sequence learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 471–494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Jiménez, L., Mendez, C., &Cleeremans, A. (1996). Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 948–969. · DOI
- Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 87–92. · DOI
- Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364. · DOI
- Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32. · DOI
- Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rah, S. K.-Y., Reber, A. S., &Hsiao, A. T. (2000). Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: It’s probably not dual task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 309–313. · DOI
- Reber, P. J., &Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness.Learning & Memory,1, 217–229. · DOI
- Reed, J., &Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 585–594. · DOI
- Schmidtke, V., &Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning.Psychological Research,60, 53–71. · DOI
- Shanks, D. R., &Johnstone, T. (1998). Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 533–572). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1061–1069. · DOI
- Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 819–827. · DOI
- Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1424–1430. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity
Poldrack, R. A., Sabb, F. W., Foerde, K., Tom, S. M., Asarnow, R. F., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Knowlton, B. J. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3880-04.2005 · Cited by 600
“Hsiao and Reber (2001) systematically varied the occurrence of the tone within the response–stimulus interval and found the greatest interference late in this interval.”
BackgroundFoerde, K., Poldrack, R. A., Knowlton, B. J., Sabb, F. W., Bookheimer, S. Y., Bilder, R. M., Guthrie, D., Granholm, E., Nuechterlein, K. H., Marder, S. R., et al. (2008) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.1.100 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsiao, A. T., & Reber, A. S.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Brooklyn College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reber, Arthur S.
- ORCID
- Reber, Arthur S.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336-342
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2074943105
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- dual-task paradigm, psychological refractory period, practice effects, task interference
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Pitch Discrimination, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Refractory Period, Psychological, Serial Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
