Attention and structure in sequence learning.
Abstract
In this study we investigated the role of attention, sequence structure, and effector specificity in learning a structured sequence of actions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unique sequences can be acquired implicitly in artificial grammar learning experiments, whereas ambiguous sequences require more attentional forms of learning.
“Similarly, Cohen, Ivry, and Keele (1990) and Curran and Keele (1993) showed that, whereas unique sequences can be acquired implicitlyin artificial grammar learning experiments, ambiguous sequences require more attentional forms of learning.”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as Cohen, Ivry, and Keele (1990)
Cites
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641 · see citing works
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230 · see citing works
Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681 · Cited by 1,959 · see citing works
AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Ellis, N. C. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310505014x · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.
Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.189 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Self-citationEmbodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design
Kirsh, D. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2442106.2442109 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach
Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.159 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study
Honda, M. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.11.2159 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Implicit Learning–Explicit Knowing: A Role for Sleep in Memory System Interaction
Fischer, S., Drosopoulos, S., Tsen, J., & Born, J. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.311 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Sleep-Dependent Consolidation of Contextual Learning
Spencer, R. M. C., Sunm, M., & Ivry, R. B. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.094 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationShea, C. H., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C. A., & Park, J.-H. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755993 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity.
Reber, P. J., & Kotovsky, K. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.178 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Investigating purchasing-sequence patterns for financial services using Markov, MTD and MTDg models
Prinzie, A., & Van den Poel, D. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.004 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Sleep consolidates the effector-independent representation of a motor skill
Witt, K., Margraf, N., Bieber, C., Born, J., & Deuschl, G. (2010) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.062 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Turner, R. S., McCairn, K., Simmons, D., & Bar-Gad, I. (2005) · The Basal Ganglia VIII · doi:10.1007/0-387-28066-9_54 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-30
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2075924004
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- attention, sequence learning, sequence structure, effector specificity, motor learning, action sequences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
