Cited by 178Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Episodic-like memory in pigeons

Open access
Zentall, Thomas R., Clement, Tricia S., Bhatt, Ramesh S., Allen, Jessica·2001·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

It has been proposed that memory for personal experiences (episodic memory, rather than semantic memory) relies on the conscious review of past experience and thus is unique to humans. In an attempt to demonstrate episodic-like memory in animals, we first trained pigeons to respond to the (nonverbal) question "Did you just peck or did you just refrain from pecking?" by training them on a symbolic matching task with differential responding required to the two line-orientation samples and reinforcing the choice of a red comparison if they had pecked and the choice of a green comparison if they had not pecked. Then, in Experiment 1, after providing the conditions for (but not requiring) the pigeons to peck at one new stimulus (a yellow hue) but not at another (a blue hue), we tested them with the new hue stimuli and the red and green comparisons. In Experiment 2, we tested the pigeons with novel stimuli (a circle, which they spontaneously pecked, and a dark response key, which they did not peck) and the red and green comparisons. In both experiments, pigeons chose the comparison appropriate to the response made to the test stimulus. Thus, the pigeons demonstrated that they could remember specific details about their past experiences, a result consistent with the notion that they have the capacity for forming episodic-like memories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196204

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–177 of 177

Metadata

Authors
Zentall, T. R., Clement, T. S., Bhatt, R. S., & Allen, J.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Zentall, Thomas R.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2001-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
685-690
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W1989109048
Cited by
178
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh059194-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-59194)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
episodic-like memory, pigeons, animal memory, semantic memory, novel stimuli, avian cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Memory, Short-Term, Columbidae, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review