Cited by 61Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

Pigeons learn to answer the question “where did you just peck?” and can report peck location when unexpectedly asked

Open access
Singer, Rebecca A., Zentall, Thomas R.·2007·Learning & Behavior

Abstract

If pigeons are trained on matching-to-sample with differential responding required to the two samples, there is evidence that the differential responding can control comparison choice. We asked whether similar responding required at two different locations could also serve as the basis for comparison choice. Pigeons were pretrained to report the location that they had pecked. To reduce the likelihood that they could use the presence of differential proprioceptive cues at the time of their report, a common response was required between the location response and the comparison choice. They were then given experience with a conditional discrimination in which location of the comparison response varied randomly and was incidental to the choice of comparison. On test trials, after the pigeons had made their comparison choice, they showed a significant tendency to choose the appropriate test comparison when they were unexpectedly asked to report the location of their previous pecking response. These results have implications for the demonstration of episodic-like memory in pigeons because they suggest that pigeons have the capacity to recall, unexpectedly, specific details about their past experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03193054

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple non-human species are able to encode and recall incidental information within remembered events.

    “These studies demonstrate that multiple non-human species are able to encode and recall incidental information within remembered events, such as spatial locations [80,81,83,93,97,98], visual markers [92], the identity of experimenters [83], the presence (or absence) of food [74,82], odour cues [94], as well as aspects of their own [79–81,93,95] and other’s behaviour [96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Training animals to explicitly encode and report information in an anticipated memory test may result in the application of non-episodic mechanisms to solve these tasks.

    “That said, training animals to explicitly encode and report information in an anticipated memory test, as is required for what–where–when memory experiments, may result in the application of non-episodic mechanisms to solve these tasks [74,79–84].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Some studies use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory, such as pecking or approaching shapes or coloured panels, or requiring subjects to recall their own or others' previous actions out of an array of behaviours.

    “Some studies, however, use non-natural methodological elements to test for episodic-like memory [75], such as pecking or approaching certain shapes or coloured panels that are presented in front of the subjects [56,78–81], or requiring subjects to recall their own or others’ previous actions out of an array of behaviours [95,96].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, R. A., & Zentall, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Zentall, Thomas R.
Venue
Learning & Behavior
Published
2007-08
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
184-189
ISSN
  • 1543-4494 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-4508
OpenAlex
W1999884740
Cited by
60
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-63726, R01MH063726)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
pigeons, episodic-like memory, location recall, matching-to-sample, conditional discrimination, differential responding, proprioceptive cues, spatial memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Color Perception, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Orientation, Columbidae, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review