Cited by 8Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Adults' Performance in an Episodic-Like Memory Task: The Role of Experience

Open access
Martin-Ordas, Gema, Atance, Cristina M.·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Episodic memory is the ability to consciously recollect personal past events. This type of memory has been tested in non-human animals by using depletion paradigms that assess whether they can remember the “what,” “where” and “when” (i.e., how long ago) of a past event. An important limitation of these behavioral paradigms is that they do not clearly identify the cognitive mechanisms (e.g., episodic memory, semantic memory) that underlie task success. Testing adult humans in a depletion paradigm will help to shed light on this issue. In two experiments, we presented university undergraduates with a depletion paradigm which involved choosing one of two food snacks—a preferred but perishable food and a less preferred but non-perishable food- either after a short or a long interval. Whereas in Experiment 1, participants were asked to imagine the time between hiding the food items and choosing one of them; in Experiment 2 participants experienced the time elapsed between hiding the food items and choosing one of them. In addition, in Experiment 2 participants were presented with 2 trials which allowed us to investigate the role of previous experience in depletion paradigms. Results across both experiments showed that participants chose the preferred and perishable food (popsicle) after the short interval but did not choose the less preferred and non-perishable food (raisins) after the long interval. Crucially, in Experiment 2 experiencing the melted popsicle in Trial l improved participants’ performance in Trial 2. We discuss our results in the context of how previous experience affects performance in depletion tasks. We also argue that variations in performance on “episodic-like memory” tasks may be due to different definitions and assessment criteria of the “when” component.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02688

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human performance across different episodic-like memory paradigms is not necessarily related, suggesting that distinct psychological processes may be employed for each.

    “Furthermore, human performance across different paradigms is not necessarily related [109], suggesting that distinct psychological processes may be employed for each [107,109,110].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

  • Humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances, but in others they fail the tasks altogether.

    “However, although humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances [106], in others they fail the tasks altogether [107,108].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tulving E. (1972). Organization of memory, in Organization of Memory, E. Tulving, and W. Donaldson (New York, NY: Academic Press), 381– 403.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin-Ordas, G., & Atance, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-01-21
Volume
9
Pages
2688-2688
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912527537
Cited by
8
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Government of Ontario
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic-like memory, temporal memory, prior experience, food choice, memory for time, semantic memory, episodic memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review