Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization
Open accessAbstract
Recall is inversely related to the number of items sharing a cue. The limiting case of unique cue-target relationships supports extremely high levels of recall, particularly when the cue is self-generated. This fact is incongruous with the importance assigned to the construct of organization in memory theory. Further, self-generated unique cue-target relationships tend to be idiosyncratic, implying that the power of unique cues should be limited to cases of self-cued memory. The experiments presented here suggest a role for organization that reconciles the fact of unique cue effectiveness with the importance of organization to memory. Two new findings are reported: Unique cue production enhances target encoding; and general cues can access particular encodings. The data are further tribute to the importance of simultaneous organizational and distinctive processing and recommend a new perspective on the function of organization in memory.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Focusing on higher-order generalities can reduce attention to distinctive details, which can affect later retrieval.
“Identifying the higher-order generalities in information can also lead to an individual paying less attention to distinctive aspects of information, which can be critical in governing the likelihood of later retrieval of that information”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hunt & Smith, 1996
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566 · see citing works
(1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,051 · see citing works
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328 · see citing works
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027577 · Cited by 2,571 · see citing works
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80048-8 · Cited by 1,512 · see citing works
Levels of processing in human memory
Hendrickson, E. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90014-8 · Cited by 1,258 · see citing works
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.254 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
Relational and item-specific information in memory
Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90138-9 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness
Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1023 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Self-citationBuildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Zangwill, O. L. (1977) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(77)90078-8 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.588 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citationDepth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall
Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1976) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(76)90040-2 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Bills, A. G. (1934) · Longmans, Green and Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/11314-016 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Perspectives on memory research : essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary
Nilsson, L.-G. (1979) · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information.
Hunt, R. R., & Seta, C. E. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.3.454 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimizing cue effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words.
Maentylae, T. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.66 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Depth, Elaboration, and Distinctiveness
Cermak, L. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315796192-14 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Rhyme and reason: Analyses of dual retrieval cues.
Rubin, D. C., & Wallace, W. T. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.698 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Elaboration and distinctiveness in episodic memory
Craik, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1979) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mäntylä, T., & Nilsson, L. (1983) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00504.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Mäntylä, T., & Nilsson, L. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.502 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Levels of Processing: Overview and Closing Comments
Cermak, L. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315796192-34 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
On the role of the speaker's expectations in interpersonal communication
Harris, G. T., Begg, I. M., & Upfold, D. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90650-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Memory Retrieval with Two Cues: Think of Intersecting Sets
Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., & Bain, J. (1993) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1477.003.0031 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The effects of cue-target uniqueness on cued recall performance
Stein, B. S. (1977) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197577 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- KELLY, R. E. S. (1993). Good cues gone bad: Self-generated distinctive cues lose their effectiveness in the absence ofexplicit recall instruc- tions. Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
- LOCKHART, R. S., CRAIK, F. I. M., & JACOBY, L. L. (1976). Depth ofpro- cessing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recog- nition (pp. 75-102). New York: Wiley.
- MANTYLA, T., & NILSSON, L. G. (1983). Are my cues better than your cues? Scandinavian Journal ofPsychology, 24, 303-312.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(01)00045-3 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2611 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best
Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A., & Poon, L. W. (1998) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211366 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
A cognitive neuroscience account of posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment
Brewin, C. R. (2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00087-5 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Understanding cognitive behaviour therapy: A retrieval competition account
Brewin, C. R. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.005 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did
Hunt, R. R. (1995) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03214414 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationPresentation modality affects false memory
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03208850 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationSchrauf, R. W., & Rubin, D. C. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2585 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
The precise time course of retention.
Rubin, D. C., Hinton, S. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1161 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
On the plasticity of the survival processing effect.
Kroneisen, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0024493 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special?
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.001 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
What causes the isolation effect?
Hunt, R. R., & Lamb, C. A. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1359 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory
Hunt, R. R. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00018-4 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationMulligan, N. W. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.25.1.54 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Dobbins, I., Kroll, N., Yonelinas, A., & Liu, Q. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2554 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Noreen, S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028888 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Distinctiveness effects in recall:
Waddill, P. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (1998) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211374 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201240 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationPrecision in Memory Through Distinctive Processing
Hunt, R. R. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412463228 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationIs the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?
Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0031214 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
How does knowledge promote memory? The distinctiveness theory of skilled memory☆
Rawson, K. A., & Overschelde, J. P. V. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.004 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028906 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Attention to item-specific processing eliminates age effects in false memories
Thomas, A. K., & Sommers, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.08.001 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Dobbins, I. G., & Kroll, N. E. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1186 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Kroneisen, M., Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (2012) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.741603 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Reducing Memory Errors: The Distinctiveness Heuristic
Schacter, D. L., & Wiseman, A. L. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0005 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Manenti, R., Sandrini, M., Gobbi, E., Binetti, G. G., & Cotelli, M. (2018) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby134 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2707 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationAdult Age Differences in Distinctive Processing: The Modality Effect on False Recall.
Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.486 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationGeraci, L. D., & Rajaram, S. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00008-6 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall: a narrative review
Wheeler, R. L., & Gabbert, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Hamilton, M., & Geraci, L. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/20445315 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Geraci, L. D., & Rajaram, S. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory
Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2002) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210143000236 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Aging, Metacognition, and Cognitive Control
Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2004) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(03)45006-8 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Memory as discrimination: A challenge to the encoding–retrieval match principle.
Poirier, M., Nairne, J. S., Morin, C., Zimmermann, F. G. S., Koutmeridou, K., & Fowler, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0024956 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness
Siefke, B. M., Smith, T. A., & Sederberg, P. B. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00925-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition
Park, H., Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193422 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Predicting others’ memory performance: The accuracy and bases of social metacognition
Tullis, J. G., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.003 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Spontaneous memory retrieval varies based on familiarity with a spatial context
Robin, J., Garzon, L. C., & Moscovitch, M. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.018 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The influence of age on memory for distinctive events
Geraci, L. D., McDaniel, M. A., Manzano, I., & Roediger, H. L., III (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.2.175 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Long-Term Memory of Past Events in Great Apes
Lewis, A., Berntsen, D., & Call, J. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418812781 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hunt, R. R. (2012) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394393-4.00001-7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategic metacognition: Self-paced study time and responsible remembering
Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., & Castel, A. D. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01307-0 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Sandrini, M., Manenti, R., Sahin, H., & Cotelli, M. (2020) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101065 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Developmental invariance in distinctiveness effects in memory.
Howe, M. L. (2006) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1193 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hertzog, C. K., Curley, T. M., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2021) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000595 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kliegl, O., & Bäuml, K. T. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000172 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Why does collaborative retrieval improve memory? Enhanced relational and item-specific processing
Wissman, K. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.003 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0478-y · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Les faux souvenirs dans le vieillissement normal : données empiriques et modèles théoriques
Taconnat, L., & Rémy, P. (2006) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503306003071 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00904-w · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0517-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-Generated Memory Cues: Effective Tools for Learning, Training, and Remembering
Tullis, J. G., & Finley, J. R. (2018) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732218788092 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Knowledge affords distinctive processing in memory
Hunt, R. R., & Rawson, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationTaconnat, L., Clarys, D., Vanneste, S., & Isingrini, M. L. (2006) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440500285585 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Mnemonics: Underlying Processes and Practical Applications
Worthen, J. B., & Hunt, R. R. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370509-9.00160-1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationRémy, P., Taconnat, L., & Isingrini, M. L. (2008) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730802070118 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sonne, T., Kingo, O. S., Berntsen, D., & Krøjgaard, P. (2020) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01310-7 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Relational Processing Framework of Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Gaigg, S., & Bowler, D. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119158431.ch1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Age Affects Strategic But Not Spontaneous Recall in 35- and 46-Month-old Children
Sonne, T., Kingo, O. S., Berntsen, D., & Krøjgaard, P. (2020) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2020.1797748 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Effects of Audiovisual Memory Cues on Working Memory Recall
Pearson, H., & Wilbiks, J. M. P. (2021) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision5010014 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Semantic Framing of Speech : Emotional and Topical Cues in Perception of Poorly Specified Speech
Lidestam, B. (2003) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Relational and item-specific influences on generate–recognize processes in recall
Guynn, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., Strosser, G. L., Ramirez, J. M., Castleberry, E. H., & Arnett, K. H. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0341-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
How evaluating memorability can lead to Unintended Consequences
Murphy, D. H., Halamish, V., Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2023) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-023-09332-3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Gayler, T., Sas, C., & Kalnikaitė, V. (2022) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2022.2107518 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
Tullis, J. G., & Finley, J. R. (2021) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2021.1979585 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Preservation of Cued Recall in the Acute Mentally Fatigued State: A Randomised Crossover Study
Flindall, I. R., Leff, D. R., Pucks, N., Sugden, C., & Darzi, A. W. (2015) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3317-9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Harris, C. B., & O’Connor, A. R. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000030 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Involuntary versus voluntary episodic memories: The effects of encoding factors and emotion.
Niziurski, J., & Berntsen, D. (2019) · Psychology of Consciousness · doi:10.1037/cns0000190 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
On the importance of contextual cues for spontaneous recall in 35- and 46-month-old children
Sonne, T., Kingo, O. S., Berntsen, D., & Krøjgaard, P. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-022-01718-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mnemonic Techniques: Underlying Processes and Practical Applications ☆
Worthen, J. B., & Hunt, R. R. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21063-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAchievement goals affect memory encoding
Ikeda, K., Kakinuma, K., Jiang, J., & Tanaka, A. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101945 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
Wong, J., & Leboe, J. P. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0013222 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lee, B.-K. (2004) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Reduced relational and item-specific processing in cognitive offloading
Magen, H., & Tomer-Offen, M. (2025) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00647-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Are older adults in Hong Kong “living in history” in their autobiographical memories?
Gu, X., Tse, C., & Chan, M. H.-M. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3603 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Personal reminders: Self-generated reminders boost memory more than normatively related ones
Zhang, D., & Tullis, J. G. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01120-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Pupil response patterns distinguish true from false memories
Kafkas, A., Brown, T., Olusola, N., & Guo, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44362-6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Effects of test sequence on anterograde and retrograde impairment of negative emotional scenes1
Takahashi, M., Itsukushima, Y., & Okabe, Y. (2006) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2006.00310.x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Oker, A., & Versace, R. (2014) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2014.04.001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues
Tullis, J. G., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2021) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01245-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Thinking about meaning: level-of-processing modulates semantic auditory distraction
Marsh, J. E., Hanczakowski, M., Beaman, C. P., Meng, Z., & Jones, D. M. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2024.2381279 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Elements of Effective Learning
Karpicke, J. D., & O’Day, G. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.70 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cuing my partner’s memory: Role of cue content and cue source
Harris, C. B., & McIlwain, N. (2026) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01824-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Monitoring in event-based prospective memory tasks
Cockman, D. (2001) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_theses.50 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Memory as discrimination: A challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle?
Poirier, M., Nairne, J. S., Morin, C., & Sharma, R. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e527352012-320 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Güzel, M. A. (2011) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
Effects of comparison and the levels of processing on recall memory
Itoh, M., & Ayabe‐Kanamura, S. (2013) · The Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5265/jcogpsy.10.175
Discrimination problems in context-dependent memory
Fowler, J. H. (2011) · City Research Online (City University London)
A cognitive theory of the etiology of fear.
Armfield, J. M. (2008) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
The Role of Encoding Strategy in the Memory for Expectation-Violating Concepts
Porubanová, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340061
Teaching and Learning Methods for Students and Residents
Castleberry, A. N., Burnworth, M., & Pope, N. D. (2019) · ASHP eBooks · doi:10.37573/9781585286270.020
Memory Attribution and Cognitive Control
Dobbins, I. G. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00279-7
An Investigation of the Role of Distinctiveness on the Production Effect
Castellano, S. (2013) · Carroll Collected (John Carroll University)
Sörqvist, P., Skog, E., Mason, A., & Marsh, J. E. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-03018-y
- Authors
- Hunt, R. R., & Smith, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hunt, R. Reed
- ORCID
- Smith, Rebekah E.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-225
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2014088214
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r15hd025587-01a1)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD25587)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- memory organization, distinctiveness, target encoding, free recall, cue competition, encoding specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Male, Paired-Associate Learning, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Verbal Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review