The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AIC model selection using Akaike weights
Open accessAbstract
The Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1973) is a popular method for comparing the adequacy of multiple, possibly nonnested models. Current practice in cognitive psychology is to accept a single model on the basis of only the "raw" AIC values, making it difficult to unambiguously interpret the observed AIC differences in terms of a continuous measure such as probability. Here we demonstrate that AIC values can be easily transformed to so-called Akaike weights (e.g., Akaike, 1978, 1979; Bozdogan, 1987; Burnham & Anderson, 2002), which can be directly interpreted as conditional probabilities for each model. We show by example how these Akaike weights can greatly facilitate the interpretation of the results of AIC model comparison procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Doing so, we show that models associating estimated social media use and life satisfaction ratings while differentiating for self-reported sex (and controlling for household income, neighbourhood deprivation, and year of data collection) are more likely to be the best models of the data between the ages of 12 and 15 (Akaike weights ratios ranging from 5:1 to over 6,000,000:1 in favour of the model”
From Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,636
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
Akaike, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294359 · Cited by 5,264
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Boltzmann, L. (1877). Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung respektive den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht.Wiener Berichte,76, 373–435.
- Myung, I. J., Forster, M. R., & Browne, M. W. (Eds.) (2000). Model selection [Special issue].Journal of Mathematical Psychology,44(1).
- Takane, Y., & Bozdogan, H. (Eds.) (1987). AIC model selection [Special issue].Psychometrika,52(3).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021) · Classroom Companion: Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 · Cited by 10,343
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
Self-citationPartial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022) · Handbook of Market Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 · Cited by 1,483
Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory
van Wijk, B. C. M., Stam, C. J., & Daffertshofer, A. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013701 · Cited by 1,161
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021) · Handbook of Market Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2 · Cited by 876
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
- Farrell, Simon
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-196
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W1987464952
- Cited by
- 2,684
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 125 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 229 · 2022: 218 · 2021: 279 · 2020: 242 · 2019: 212 · 2018: 188 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- Akaike information criterion, Akaike weights, model selection, model comparison, conditional probability, cognitive psychology, model adequacy
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Choice Behavior, Humans, Models, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
