Cited by 104Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Is age kinder to females than to males?

Open access
Meinz, Elizabeth J., Salthouse, Timothy A.·1998·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03209457

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men typically outperform women on tasks assessing visuospatial and arithmetic processing, whereas women typically outperform men on tasks involving reasoning and verbal abilities.

    “gender differences in cognitive functioning have long been documented, with men typically outperforming women on tasks assessing visuospatial and arithmetric processing, whereas women typically outperform men on tasks involving reasoning and verbal abilities”

    From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Meinz & Salthouse, 1998

    The Gender Effects section reports a male advantage on spatial tasks, and the Discussion describes a male advantage on quantitative measures and reports prior findings of a female advantage in verbal abilities. But this study found that males outperformed females on reasoning tasks, while its differences in verbal fluency and knowledge were not significant. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. BLANCHARD-FIELDS, E, & HESS, T. M. (EDS.) (1996). Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  2. COWELL, P. E., TuRETSKY, B. I., GUR, R c., GROSSMAN, R I., SHTASEL, D. L., & GUR, R. E. (1994), Sex differences in aging of the human frontal and temporal lobes. Journal ofNeuroscience, 14,4748-4755.
  3. CRAIK, ELM., & SALTHOUSE, T. A. (Eds.) (1992), The handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
  4. ELIAS, M. E, ROBBINS, M. A., WALTER, L. J., & SCHULTZ, N, R. (1993). The influence of gender and age on Halstead-Reitan Neuropsycho- logical Test performance, Journal ofGerontology: Psychological Sci- ences, 48, P278-P28I.
  5. GUR, R. c., MOZLEY, P. D., RESNICK, S. M., GoTTLIEB, G. E., KOHN, M., ZIMMERMAN, R, HERMAN, G" ATLAS, S., GROSSMAN, R., BERRETTA, D., ERWIN, R., & GUR, R. E. (1991), Gender differences in age effect on brain atrophy measured by magnetic resonance imaging, Proceedings ofthe National Academy ofSciences, 88, 2845-2849.
  6. HEDGES, L. v., & OLKIN, I. (1985), Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  7. HYDE, J. S., FENNEMA, E, & LAMON, S, J. (1990), Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107,139-155.
  8. HYDE, J. S., & LINN, M. C. (1986). The psychology ofgender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. AYE, J. A., DECARLI, c., LUXENBERG, J. S., & RAPOPORT, S. I. (1992). The significance ofage-related enlargement ofthe cerebral ventricles in healthy men and women measured by quantitative computed x-ray tomography. Journal ofthe American Geriatrics Society, 40, 225-231.
  10. LINN, M. c., & PETERSEN, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis ofgender dif- ferences in spatial abilities: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In 1. S, Hyde & M. C. Linn, (Eds,), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67-10 I), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  11. MACCOBY, E. E" & JACKLIN, C. N, (1974), The psychologyofsexdijjer- ences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,
  12. E. J., & SALTHOUSE, T. A. (1998), The effects of age and expe- rience on memory for visually presented music. Journal ofGerontol- ogy: Psychological Sciences, 538, P60-P69,
  13. RAZ, N., TORRES, L J,. & ACKER. J. D, (1995), Age, gender, and hemi- spheric differences in human striatum: A quantitative review and new

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meinz, E. J., & Salthouse, T. A.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Meinz, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
1998-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
56-70
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2090217712
Cited by
104
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
gender differences, cognitive aging, age-related cognitive decline, sex differences in cognition, age-gender interaction, processing speed, reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review