Cited by 112Spatial Cognition and NavigationAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Spatial Abilities and Aging: A Meta-Analysis

Techentin, Cheryl, Voyer, Daniel, Voyer, Susan D.·2014·Experimental Aging Research

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Age-related effects in performance on spatial tasks have been well documented, with results suggesting a negative effect on performance in older samples. Although meta-analyses have been conducted examining performance on specific spatial tasks, it appears that data incorporating a variety of tasks have not yet been integrated into a single meta-analyses. METHODS: The present study examined age-related effects on spatial abilities in a multilevel meta-analysis of 137 effect sizes, drawn from 80 samples dated between 1958 and 2011. In addition to sample characteristics (education, year of publication, and age range), procedural factors (spatial ability category, spatial task, dependent variable, task setting, and medium of administration) were also considered. The standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) was used as the effect size measure in meta-analytic calculations. RESULTS: RESULTS revealed a large (mean d = 1.01) age-related decrease in spatial performance on psychometric tests. Specifically, older adults (mean age range = 63-79.5 years) performed worse on psychometric tests than younger adults (mean age range = 17-28.6 years). Interestingly, this age effect was unaffected by factors such as specific test, test category (mental rotation, spatial perception, or spatial visualization), timing conditions, and group or individual administration. However, measures of response time produced significantly larger effects of age than measures of accuracy on spatial performance. CONCLUSION: The present analysis demonstrates a clear pattern of negative age effects in spatial ability across the literature. Although these effects are unaffected by the specific spatial component under investigation or testing conditions, speed of processing was shown to be an important factor in spatial performance. The need to report more thoroughly on characteristics of young and old participants in future studies is also emphasized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0361073x.2014.926773

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because navigation is one of the greatest difficulties for older users, linear navigation can be useful for improving usability results with elderly users.

    “Thus, because navigation is one of the greatest difficulties for older users, linear navigation can be useful for improving usability results with elderly users [46,76,77].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Techentin, C., Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Mount Royal University (CA)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Corresponding author
Techentin, Cheryl
Venue
Experimental Aging Research
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
395-425
ISSN
  • 0361-073X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4657
OpenAlex
W2028513193
Cited by
112
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Aging Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
spatial ability, aging, age-related decline, older adults, mental rotation, spatial perception, spatial visualization, reaction time (psychology), processing speed, psychometric tests, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Young Adult, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review