CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceiving geographical slant

Proffitt, Dennis R., Bhalla, Mukul, Gossweiler, Rich, Midgett, Jonathan·1995·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
DOI 10.3758/bf03210980
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03210980

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has found that most walking takes place on low walking slopes.

    “Previous research has found that most walking takes place on low walking slopes [33], and this is evidenced by our data (∼98% of our data was from walking slopes of under 10 degrees).”

    From Improved prediction of hiking speeds using a data driven approach (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Braunstein, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 247–253. · DOI
  2. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., &Nagle, M. (1979). Relationship between cognitive and motor systems of visual position perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 692–700. · DOI
  3. Bruner, J. S., &Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,42, 33–44. · DOI
  4. Bruner, J. S., &Rodrigues, J. S. (1953). Some determinants of apparent size.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,48, 17–24. · DOI
  5. Clark, W. C., Smith, A. H., &Rabe, A. (1956a). The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and ground in the perception of slant.Canadian Journal of Psychology,10, 1–8. · DOI
  6. Clark, W. C., Smith, A. H., &Rabe, A. (1956b). Retinal gradients of outline distortion and binocular disparity as stimuli for slant.Canadian Journal of Psychology,10, 77–81. · DOI
  7. Epstein, W. (1981). The relationship between texture gradient and perceived slant-in-depth: Direct or mediated?Perception,10, 695–702. · DOI
  8. Epstein, W., &Mountford, D. (1963). Judgments of slant in response to an isolated gradient of stimulation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,16, 733–737. · DOI
  9. Epstein, W., &Park, J. N. (1963). Shape constancy: Functional relationships and theoretical formulations.Psychological Bulletin,60, 265–288. · DOI
  10. Eriksson, E. S. (1964). Monocular slant perception and the texture gradient concept.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,5, 123–128. · DOI
  11. Farah, M. (1990).Visual agnosia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Ferrera, V. P., Nealey, T. A., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1994). Responses in macaque visual area V4 following inactivation of the parvocellular and magnocellular LGN pathways.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2080–2088. · DOI
  13. Flock, H. R. (1964). Some conditions sufficient for accurate monocular perceptions of moving surface slants.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 560–572. · DOI
  14. Flock, H. R., Graves, D., Tennet, J., &Stepehenson, B. (1967). Slant judgments of single rectangles at a slant.Psychonomic Science,7, 57–58. · DOI
  15. Foley, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance.Perception,7, 449–460. · DOI
  16. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception.Psychological Review,87, 411–434. · DOI
  17. Freeman, R. B. (1966a). Absolute threshold for visual slant: The effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 170–176. · DOI
  18. Freeman, R. B. (1966b). The effect of size on visual slant.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 96–103. · DOI
  19. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of visual surfaces.American Journal of Psychology,63, 367–384. · DOI
  20. Gibson, J. J., &Cornsweet, J. (1952). The perceived slant of visual surfaces— optical and geographical.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 11–15. · DOI
  21. Gillam, B. (1970). Judgments of slant on the basis of foreshortening.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,11, 31–34. · DOI
  22. Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences,15, 20–25. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kammann, R. (1967). The overestimation of vertical distance and slope and its role in the moon illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 585–589. · DOI
  24. Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., Shaw, B., &Turvey, M. T. (1992). Perceiving walk-on-able slopes.Ecological Psychology,4, 223–239. · DOI
  25. Kraft, A. L., &Winnick, W. A. (1967). The effect of pattern and texture gradient on slant and shape judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 141–147. · DOI
  26. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J., Fujita, N., &Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 906–921. · DOI
  27. Matin, L., &Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.Vision Research,29, 315–324. · DOI
  28. Matin, L., &Li, W. (1992). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 257–289. · DOI
  29. McCurdy, H. G. (1956). Coin perception and the concept of schemata.Psychological Review,63, 160–168. · DOI
  30. Murray, W. H. (1947).Mountaineering in Scotland. London: Dent.
  31. Nealey, T. A., &Maunsell, J. H. R. (1994). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to the responses of neurons in macaque striate cortex.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2069–2079. · DOI
  32. Perrone, J. A., &Wenderoth, P. M. (1991). Visual slant underestimation. In S. R. Ellis (Ed.),Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 496–503). London: Taylor & Francis.
  33. Phillips, R. J. (1970). Stationary visual texture and the estimation of slant angle.Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 389–397. · DOI
  34. Robinett, W., &Rolland, J. (1991). A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display.SPIE Proceedings: Stereoscopic displays and applications II,1457, 140. · DOI
  35. Ross, H. E. (1974).Behavior and perception in strange environments. London: George Allen & Unwin.
  36. Schneider, G. E. (1969, February 28). Two visual systems.Science,163, 895–902. · DOI
  37. Smith, A. H. (1966). Phenomenal slant as a function of ambiguity of contour perspective.Perceptual & Motor Skills,23, 587–594. · DOI
  38. Smith, A. H. (1967). Perceived slant as a function of stimulus contour and vertical dimension.Perceptual & Motor Skills,24, 167–173. · DOI
  39. Stoper, A. E., &Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured environments on apparent eye level.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 469–475. · DOI
  40. Stoper, A. E.,Fries, C., &Bautista, A. (1992, November).The effect of environmental pitch on apparent slant. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis. · DOI
  41. Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude.Psychological Review,64, 192–204. · DOI
  42. Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  43. Willey, R., &Gyr, J. W. (1969). Motion parallax and projective similarity as factors in slant perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 525–532. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1995-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
409-428
ISSN
  • 1069-9384
  • 1531-5320
DOI
10.3758/bf03210980
Cited by
347
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review