Further explorations with a process model for water jug problems
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Water-jug problems can be constructed such that they put a substantial burden on working memory.
“Water-jug problems can be constructed such that they put a substantial burden on working memory (Atwood & Polson, 1976;Atwood, Masson, & Polson, 1980).”
From Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency (2002) · cites this paper as Atwood, Masson, & Polson, 1980
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211 · Cited by 3,498 · see citing works
Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.176 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency
Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00017-2 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Blech, C., Gaschler, R., & Bilalić, M. (2020) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2019.1685001 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Atwood, M. E., Masson, M. E. J., & Polson, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-192
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2015790101
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- process model, planning, problem solving, sequence generation, cognitive modeling, model evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Memory, Mental Processes, Models, Psychological, Task Performance and Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
