The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“engages working memory (Hinson et al., 2002)”
From Dual conception of risk in the Iowa Gambling Task: effects of sleep deprivation and test-retest gap (2013) · cites this paper as Hinson et al., 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · Cited by 6,128
The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
Damasio, A. R. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0125 · Cited by 2,847 · cited 3×
“Moreover, these patients make spur-of-the-moment decisions about actions in interpersonal settings or social groups that seriously disrupt long-term social relations (Damasio, 1994, 1998).”
BackgroundHeroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls.
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78 · Cited by 2,171
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05473.1999 · Cited by 2,001
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256 · Cited by 911
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among work- ing memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimen- tal Psychology: General, 130, 224-237.
- Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5-28.
- Baddeley,A. D., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001). Working mem- ory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 641-657.
- Baddeley, A. [D.], Emslie, H., Kolodny, J., & Duncan, J. (1998). Random generation and the executive control of working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 819-852.
- Baddeley,A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974).Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89), New York: Academic Press.
- Barratt, E. S. (1994). Impulsiveness and aggression. In J. Monahan & H. J. Steadman (Eds.), Violence and mental disorders: Developments in risk assessment (pp. 61-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). Dis- sociation of working memory from decision-making within the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 428-437.
- Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. In H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg, & A. L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction (pp. 217-229). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electro- dermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200-223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Fuster, J. M. (1999). Cognitive functions of the frontal lobes. In B. L. Miller & J. L. Cummings (Eds.), The human frontal lobes: Functions and disorders (pp. 187-195). New York: Guilford.
- Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections, and controversies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of compre- hension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
- Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of pre- frontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
- O'Reilly, R. C., Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). A biologically based computational model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 375-411). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor struc- ture of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychol- ogy, 51, 768-774.
- Richardson, J. T. E. (1996). Evolving issues in working memory. In J. T. E. Richardson, R. W. Engle, L. Hasher, R. H. Logie, E. R. Stoltzfus, & R. T. Zacks (Eds.), Working memory and human cognition (pp. 120- 154). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Toms, M., Morris, N., & Ward, D. (1993). Working memory and con- ditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 679-699.
- Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Decision making and the somatic marker hypothesis. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1061). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation
Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001 · Cited by 894
Hongwanishkul, D., Happaney, K. R., Lee, W. S. C., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_4 · Cited by 654
Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making
Clark, L., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Aitken, M. R. F., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn066 · Cited by 613
Does leadership need emotional intelligence?
Antonakis, J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dasborough, M. T. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.006 · Cited by 515
The origins of altruism in offspring care.
Preston, S. D. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0031755 · Cited by 368
Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002 · Cited by 326
Toplak, M. E., Jain, U., & Tannock, R. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-1-8 · Cited by 303
A Blessing and a Curse: How CEOs’ Trait Empathy Affects Their Management of Organizational Crises
König, A., Graf-Vlachy, L., Bundy, J., & Little, L. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0387 · Cited by 237
Romer, D., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., Farah, M., & Hurt, H. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.019 · Cited by 209
Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach
Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546781003630117 · Cited by 155
Age-related changes in decision making: Comparing informed and noninformed situations
Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Jansen, B. R. J., Bredman, J. C., & Huizenga, H. M. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025601 · Cited by 94
Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)
Simonovic, B., Stupple, E. J. N., Gale, M., & Sheffield, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00217 · Cited by 61
Starcke, K., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Markowitsch, H.-J., & Brand, M. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800902996831 · Cited by 59
Duarte, N. A., Woods, S. P., Rooney, A., Atkinson, J. H., & Grant, I. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.006 · Cited by 56
Dual conception of risk in the Iowa Gambling Task: effects of sleep deprivation and test-retest gap
Singh, V. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00628 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- HINSON, J. M., JAMESON, T. L., & WHITNEY, P.
- Venue
- Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 341-353
- ISSN
- 1530-7026
- 1531-135X
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review