Cited by 94Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Age-related changes in decision making: Comparing informed and noninformed situations

Van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K., Jansen, Brenda R. J., Bredman, Joren C., Huizenga, Hilde M.·2012·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Advantageous decision making progressively develops into early adulthood, most specifically in complex and motivationally salient decision situations in which direct feedback on gains and losses is provided (Figner & Weber, 2011). However, the factors that underlie this developmental improvement in decision making are still not well understood. The current study therefore investigates 2 potential factors, long-term memory and working memory, by assigning a large developmental sample (7-29 years of age) to a condition with either high or low demands on long-term and working memory. The first condition featured an age-adapted version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, & Anderson, 1994; i.e., a noninformed situation), whereas the second condition provided an external store where explicit information on gains, losses, and probabilities per choice option was presented (i.e., an informed situation). Consistent with previous developmental IGT studies, children up to age 12 did not learn to prefer advantageous options in the noninformed condition. In contrast, all age groups learned to prefer the advantageous options in the informed conditions, although a slight developmental increase in advantageous decision making remained. These results indicate that lowering dependence on long-term and working memory improves children's advantageous decision making. The results additionally suggest that other factors, like inhibitory control processes, may play an additional role in the development of advantageous decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025601

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Important capabilities in the 'cold' decision-making strategy are understanding probabilities, updating this knowledge in working memory and storing it in long-term memory, and inhibiting responses to occasional feedback.

    “Important capabilities in this strategy are the understanding of probabilities, the ability to update this knowledge in working memory and store it in long-term memory, and to be able to inhibit responses to occasional feedback [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Jansen, B. R. J., Bredman, J. C., & Huizenga, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
192-203
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2048510552
Cited by
94
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
decision-making, age-related development, long-term memory, working memory, Iowa Gambling Task, children, inhibitory control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Child, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Knowledge, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review