CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 132

Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words

Diependaele, Kevin, Sandra, Dominiek, Grainger, Jonathan·2009·Memory & Cognition
DOI 10.3758/mc.37.6.895
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/mc.37.6.895

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological influences reflect both morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing.

    “According to the account of morphological processing proposed by Diependaele et al. (2005, 2009; see also Morris et al., 2011), such morphological influences not only reflect morpho-orthographic processing, but also morpho-semantic processing.”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Diependaele et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole- word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 801-820.
  2. Bergman, M. W., Hudson, P. T. W., & Eling, P. A. T. M. (1988). How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 41-72.
  3. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 1-13.
  4. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem- ory, & Cognition, 24, 1238-1255.
  5. Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., & Sandra, D. (in press). Derivational morphology and skilled reading: An empirical overview. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psy- cholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross- modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 75-114. doi:10.1080/01690960444000197 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J., & Grainger, J. (in press). Fast phonol- ogy and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Experimental Psychology.
  8. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed- letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001 · DOI
  9. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language & Cogni- tive Processes, 23, 1002-1020. doi:10.1080/01690960802164242 · DOI
  10. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
  11. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). On the role of derivational af- fixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 209-232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  12. Gold, B. T., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983-1993.
  13. Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370-384.
  14. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Fa- rioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1256-1269. doi:10.1037/0278 -7393.29.6.1256 · DOI
  15. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in vi- sual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 218-233.
  16. Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 342-348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002 · DOI
  17. Hyman, L. M. (2008). Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics, 46, 309-350. doi:10.1515/LING.2008.012 · DOI
  18. Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of deri- vational affixes: Implications for processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 345-364). Hills- dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morpho- logical analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866-877.
  20. Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 26-41. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008 · DOI
  21. Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological prim- ing without morphological relationship. Language & Cognitive Pro- cesses, 18, 313-334. doi:10.1080/01690960244000036 · DOI
  22. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psycho- logical Review, 101, 3-33.
  23. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a "fete" in "fetish"? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Lan- guage, 58, 307-326. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006 · DOI
  24. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (2002). Cross-modal morphological priming in French. Brain & Language, 81, 89-102. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2509 · DOI
  25. Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Se- mantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506-521. doi:10.1111/j.1469 -8986.2007.00538.x · DOI
  26. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Pro- cesses, 23, 942-971. doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · DOI
  27. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recogni- tion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
  28. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological pro- cessing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-09
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
895-908
ISSN
  • 0090-502X
  • 1532-5946
DOI
10.3758/mc.37.6.895
Cited by
132
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review