Cited by 58Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysis

Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype

Open access
POTTER, T., CORNEILLE, O.·2008·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Face attractiveness relates positively to the mathematical averageness of a face, but how close attractive faces of varying groups are to their own and to other-group prototypes in the face space remains unclear. In two studies, we modeled the locations of attractive and unattractive Caucasian, Asian, and African faces in participants' face space using multidimensional scaling analysis. In all three sets of faces, facial attractiveness significantly increased with the absolute proximity of a face to its group prototype. In the case of Caucasian and African faces (Study 1), facial attractiveness also tended to increase with the absolute proximity of a face to the other-group prototype. However, this association was at best marginal, and it became clearly nonsignificant when distance to the own-group prototype was controlled for. Thus, the present research provides original evidence that average features of faces contribute to increasing their attractiveness, but only when these features are average to the group to which a face belongs. The present research also offers further support to face space models of people's mental representations of faces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/pbr.15.3.615

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence from the face perception literature that an average face, one closer to the population mean, is consistently rated as being attractive.

    “There is some evidence from the face perception literature that an average face, one closer to the population mean, is consistently rated as being attractive (Rhodes et al., 2000; Valentine et al., 2004; Potter and Corneille, 2008).”

    From The degree to which the cultural ideal is internalized predicts judgments of male and female physical attractiveness (2022) · cites this paper as Potter and Corneille, 2008

    The Discussion reports that faces with more average features were rated as more attractive across the face sets studied. But it explicitly limits the relationship to proximity to each face’s own-group prototype, not a general population mean; it also notes that only Caucasian participants were studied. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
POTTER, T., & CORNEILLE, O.
Affiliations
  • Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
POTTER, T.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
615-622
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2014324648
Cited by
58
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université Catholique de Louvain
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
facial attractiveness, face space, facial averageness, face perception
MeSH terms
Beauty, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Social Desirability, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review