The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The own-age bias seems to be at least partially based on experience.
“This bias seems to be at least partially based on experience (Harrison & Hole, 2009)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Harrison & Hole, 2009
In typical perceivers, adult face memory performance may be facilitated in individuals who frequently have contact with children, such as nursery teachers.
“but may be facilitated in individuals who frequently have contact with children (e.g., nursery teachers: de Heering & Rossion, 2008; Harrison & Hole, 2009; Rhodes & Anastasi, 2012).”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Harrison & Hole, 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience
Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1323 · Cited by 2,223
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Adams-Price, C. (1992). Eyewitness memory and aging: Predictors of accuracy in recall and person recognition. Psychology & Aging, 7, 602–608. · DOI
- Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1043–1047. · DOI · Paper page
- Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2006). Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237–252.
- Bäckman, L. (1991). Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 19, 63–71. · DOI
- Bartlett, J. C., & Leslie, J. E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces. Memory & Cognition, 14, 371–381. · DOI
- Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139–155. · DOI
- Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879–894. · DOI
- Clifford, C. W. G., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.) (2005). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117. · DOI
- Fulton, A., & Bartlett, J. C. (1991). Young and old faces in young and old heads: The factor of age in face recognition. Psychology & Aging, 6, 623–630. · DOI
- Lamont, A. C., Stewart-Williams, S., & Podd, J. (2005). Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1017–1024. · DOI
- Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1364–1382. · DOI
- Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574. · DOI
- Lindholm, T. (2005). Own-age biases in verbal person memory. Memory, 13, 21–30. · DOI
- List, J. A. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developmental Psychology, 22, 50–57. · DOI
- Mason, S. E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 151–154. · DOI
- Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 3–35. · DOI · Paper page
- Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608–615. · DOI
- Perfect, T. J., & Harris, L. J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? Memory & Cognition, 31, 570–580. · DOI
- Perfect, T. J., & Moon, H. C. (2005). The own-age effect in face recognition. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.), Measuring the mind: Speed, control and age (pp. 317–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. · DOI
- Rhodes, G., Tan, S., Brake, S., & Taylor, K. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313–331. · DOI
- Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 538–552. · DOI
- Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., Memon, A., & Swanson, K. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 207–214. · DOI
- Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., & Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in Whites. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71–84. · DOI
- Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 36–97. · DOI
- Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a crosscultural study. Cognition, 93, B1-B9. · DOI
- Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204. · DOI
- Wiese, H., Schweinberger, S. R., & Hansen, K. (2008). The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2973–2985. · DOI
- Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., & Tredoux, C. G. (2003). Inter-racial contact and the own-race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 365–373. · DOI
- Wright, D. B., & Sladden, B. (2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114, 101–114. · DOI
- Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 641–654. · DOI
- Yarmey, A. D. (1993). Adult age and gender differences in eyewitness recall in field settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1921–1932. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facial age affects emotional expression decoding
Fölster, M., Hess, U., & Werheid, K. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00030 · Cited by 139
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
A test of age bias in children and adults in prospective person memory
Moore, K. N., Hanan, R. L., & Gaona, K. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4140
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, V., & Hole, G. J.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264-269
- ISSN
- 1069-9384
- 1531-5320
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review