The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture
Open accessAbstract
The visual system is exquisitely adapted to the task of extracting conceptual information from visual input with every new eye fixation, three or four times a second. Here we assess the minimum viewing time needed for visual comprehension, using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of a series of six or 12 pictures presented at between 13 and 80 ms per picture, with no interstimulus interval. Participants were to detect a picture specified by a name (e.g., smiling couple) that was given just before or immediately after the sequence. Detection improved with increasing duration and was better when the name was presented before the sequence, but performance was significantly above chance at all durations, whether the target was named before or only after the sequence. The results are consistent with feedforward models, in which an initial wave of neural activity through the ventral stream is sufficient to allow identification of a complex visual stimulus in a single forward pass. Although we discuss other explanations, the results suggest that neither reentrant processing from higher to lower levels nor advance information about the stimulus is necessary for the conscious detection of rapidly presented, complex visual information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 19,702
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Dehaene, S. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2 · Cited by 2,498
The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing
Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01657-x · Cited by 2,338 · cited 1×
“…feedforward activation generating possible interpretations that are fed back and compared with lower levels of processing for confirmation, establishing reentrant loops (Di Lollo, 2012; Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000; Enns & Di Lollo, 2000; Hochstein & Ahissar, 2002; Lamme & Roelfsema, 2000).”
BackgroundHow does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Top-down facilitation of visual recognition
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., Hämäläinen, M. S., Marinkovic, K., Schacter, D. L., Rosen, B. R., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507062103 · Cited by 1,489
Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.680 · Cited by 1,420
Hochstein (2002) · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01091-7 · Cited by 1,397
A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529 · Cited by 1,347
Cited by
Cadieu, C. F., Hong, H., Yamins, D. L. K., Pinto, N., Ardila, D., Solomon, E. A., Majaj, N. J., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003963 · Cited by 824
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367
A review of rapid serial visual presentation-based brain–computer interfaces
Lees, S., Dayan, N., Cecotti, H., McCullagh, P., Maguire, L., Lotte, F., & Coyle, D. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa9817 · Cited by 149
Discrete and continuous mechanisms of temporal selection in rapid visual streams
Marti, S., & Dehaene, S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02079-x · Cited by 127
Social Media Message Designs to Educate Adolescents About E-Cigarettes
Lazard, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.030 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Hagmann, C. E., & McCourt, E. S.
- Venue
- Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2013-12-28
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-279
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- OpenAlex
- W1981794758
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z
- The paper
- Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Hagmann, C. E., & McCourt, E. S. (2014). Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
