Cited by 48Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects

Open access
Keys, Robert T., Taubert, Jessica, Wardle, Susan G.·2021·Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Abstract

Face detection is a priority of both the human and primate visual system. However, occasionally we misperceive faces in inanimate objects -- "face pareidolia". A key feature of these 'false positives' is that face perception occurs in the absence of visual features typical of real faces. Human faces are known to be located faster than objects in visual search. Here we used a visual search paradigm to test whether illusory faces share this advantage. Search times were faster for illusory faces than for matched objects amongst both matched (Experiment 1) and diverse (Experiment 2) distractors, however search times for real human faces were faster and more efficient than objects with or without an illusory face. Importantly, this result indicates that illusory faces are processed quickly enough by the human brain to confer a visual search advantage, suggesting the engagement of a broadly-tuned mechanism that facilitates rapid face detection in cluttered environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13414-021-02267-4

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The human visual system is faster and more efficient at locating human faces than other objects, including objects with illusory faces.

    “The human visual system is faster and more efficient at locating human faces than other objects, including objects with illusory faces (63).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Keys, R. T., Taubert, J., & Wardle, S. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Keys, Robert T.
Venue
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
1942-1953
ISSN
  • 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-393X
OpenAlex
W3138284235
Cited by
48
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Macquarie University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1072245)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face pareidolia, visual search, face detection, face perception, object recognition, distractor interference
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Face, Humans, Illusions, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review