Cited by 122Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMathematics Education and PedagogyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems

Rohrer, Doug, Dedrick, Robert F., Burgess, Kaleena·2014·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Most mathematics assignments consist of a group of problems requiring the same strategy. For example, a lesson on the quadratic formula is typically followed by a block of problems requiring students to use that formula, which means that students know the appropriate strategy before they read each problem. In an alternative approach, different kinds of problems appear in an interleaved order, which requires students to choose the strategy on the basis of the problem itself. In the classroom-based experiment reported here, grade 7 students (n = 140) received blocked or interleaved practice over a nine-week period, followed two weeks later by an unannounced test. The mean test scores were greater for material learned by interleaved practice rather than by blocked practice (72 % vs. 38 %, d = 1.05). This interleaving effect was observed even though the different kinds of problems were superficially dissimilar from each other, whereas previous interleaved mathematics studies had required students to learn nearly identical kinds of problems. We conclude that interleaving improves mathematics learning not only by improving discrimination between different kinds of problems, but also by strengthening the association between each kind of problem and its corresponding strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Category discrimination can play an indirect role in mathematical tasks.

    “Less directly, as Rohrer et al. (2014) noted, category discrimination may form only part of a task: Solving a problem might involve first identifying the type of problem and then retrieving the procedure for solving it.”

    From Interleaving in Mathematical Category Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Rohrer et al., 2014

  • In Rohrer et al. (2014), although dissimilar mathematics problems were used, students were novices and had to learn which solution was appropriate, requiring them to contrast and discriminate between the problems and leading to the interleaving effect.

    “It also should be noted that in the study of Rohrer et al. (2014), while dissimilar mathematics problems were used, students were novices with respect to those problems and so had to learn which solution was appropriate, an activity which required them to contrast and discriminate between the problems leading to the interleaving effect.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rohrer, Doug
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2014-02-28
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
1323-1330
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2028527344
Cited by
122
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
interleaving, blocked practice, mathematics learning, problem types, strategy selection, transfer of learning, seventh grade students, quadratic formula
MeSH terms
Child, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Mathematics, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review