Cited by 103Memory Processes and InfluencesMathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

How the amount and spacing of retrieval practice affect the short- and long-term retention of mathematics knowledge

Lyle, Keith B., Bego, Campbell R., Hopkins, Robin F., Hieb, Jeffrey L., Ralston, Patricia A. S.·2020·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-019-09489-x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-randomized interventions, assessed using ROBINS-I, showed moderate to low risks, particularly regarding participant selection and confounding variables.

    “Non-randomized interventions, assessed using ROBINS-I, showed moderate to low risks, particularly regarding participant selection and confounding variables (Lyle et al., 2020;Taveira-Gomes et al., 2015).”
  • Several studies employed within-subject designs to control for individual student variability.

    “Furthermore, several studies employed within-subject designs to control for individual student variability, effectively comparing massed versus distributed retrieval practice within the same cohorts of engineering, medicine, and language students”
  • In studies such as Lyle et al. (2020) and Taveira-Gomes et al. (2015), the lack of formal randomization introduced potential confounding variables-such as prior knowledge or varying levels of baseline cognitive load-which may have interacted with the spacing effect.

    “In studies such as those of Lyle et al. (2020) and Taveira-Gomes et al. (2015), the lack of formal randomization introduced potential confounding variables-such as prior knowledge or varying levels of baseline cognitive load-which may have interacted with the spacing effect.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyle, K. B., Bego, C. R., Hopkins, R. F., Hieb, J. L., & Ralston, P. A. S.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Lyle, Keith B.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2019-06-06
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
277-295
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2949036105
Cited by
103
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF DUE-IUSE 1609290)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
retrieval practice, spacing effect, memory retention, mathematics learning, precalculus, engineering students, long-term retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review