The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,278
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621 · cited 2×
“Pearson and Filon (1898) devised a method for comparing two nonindependent correlations with no variables in common, but a revised version of it by Steiger (1980) yields a “ theoretically better test statistic ” (Raghunathan et al., 1996, p. 179).”
MethodOn the probable error of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample
Fisher, R. A. (1921) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 2,089
The Generalization of Student's Ratio
Hotelling, H. (1931) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732979 · Cited by 1,492
THE COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES IN MATCHED SAMPLES
COCHRAN, W. G. (1950) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256 · Cited by 1,465
Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis
Afifi, A. A., & Clark, V. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3342-3 · Cited by 1,358
Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis
Fleiss, J. (1993) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029300200202 · Cited by 1,281
The Generalization of Student’s Ratio
Hotelling, H. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_4 · Cited by 1,083
Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations.
Zou, G. Y. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.4.399 · Cited by 740
Cited by
cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations
Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121945 · Cited by 1,919
Doran, R., & Larsen, S. (2016) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.2042 · Cited by 314
Martin, L., Hopkins, J., Malietzis, G., Jenkins, J. T., Sawyer, M. B., Brisebois, R., MacLean, A., Nelson, G., Gramlich, L., & Baracos, V. E. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6652-x · Cited by 139
Memory reactivation in healthy aging: evidence of stimulus-specific dedifferentiation
St-Laurent, M., Abdi, H., Bondad, A., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3054-13.2014 · Cited by 126
Chambon, V., Farrer, C., Pacherie, E., Jacquet, P. O., Leboyer, M., & Zalla, T. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.005 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, B., & Wuensch, K. L.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2013-01-24
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 880-895
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W2027900864
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/s13428-012-0289-7
- The paper
- Weaver, B., & Wuensch, K. L. (2013). SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0289-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
