CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Musical Ear Test: Norms and correlates from a large sample of Canadian undergraduates

Swaminathan, Swathi, Kragness, Haley E., Schellenberg, E. Glenn·2021·Behavior Research Methods
DOI 10.3758/s13428-020-01528-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13428-020-01528-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(2), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000022 · DOI
  2. Baer, L. H., Park, M. T., Bailey, J. A., Chakravarty, M. M., Li, K. Z. H., & Penhune, V. B. (2015). Regional cerebellar volumes are related to early musical training and finger tapping performance. NeuroImage, 105, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.076 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bailey, J. A., & Penhune, V. B. (2010). Rhythm synchronization performance and auditory working memory in early- and late-trained musicians. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2299-y · DOI
  4. Bailey, J., & Penhune, V. B. (2012). A sensitive period for musical training: Contributions of age of onset and cognitive abilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06434.x · DOI
  5. Bailey, J. A., & Penhune, V. B. (2013). The relationship between the age of onset of musical training and rhythm synchronization performance: Validation of sensitive period effects. Frontiers in Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, 7:227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00227 · DOI
  6. Bailey, J. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Penhune, V. B. (2014). Early musical training: Effects on auditory motor integration and grey matter structure in ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(4), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00527 · DOI
  7. Bhatara, A., Yeung, H. H., & Nazzi, T. (2015). Foreign language learning in French speakers is associated with rhythm perception, but not with melody perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038736 · DOI
  8. Bidelman, G. M., & Chung, W.-L. (2015). Tone-language speakers show hemispheric specialization and differential cortical processing of contour and interval cues for pitch. Neuroscience, 305, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.010 · DOI
  9. Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21362 · DOI
  10. Bidelman, G. M., Hutka, S., & Moreno, S. (2013). Tone language speakers and musicians share enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: Evidence for bidirectionality between the domains of language and music. PloS ONE, 8(4): e60676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060676 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bidelman, G. M., & Lee, C.-C. (2015). Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech. NeuroImage, 120,191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.087 · DOI
  12. Bors, D. A., & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058003002 · DOI
  13. Butkovic, A., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2015). Personality related traits as predictors of music practice: Underlying environmental and genetic influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.006 · DOI
  14. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chang, E. F., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development. Science, 300(5618), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082163 · DOI
  16. Correia, A. I., Castro, S. L., MacGregor, C., Müllensiefen, D., Schellenberg, E. G., & Lima, C. F. (2020). Enhanced recognition of vocal emotions in individuals with naturally good musical abilities. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000770 · DOI
  17. Coumel, M., Christiner, M., & Reiterer, S. M. (2019) Second language accent faking ability depends on musical abilities, not on working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00257 · DOI
  18. Deutsch, D. (2013). Absolute pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 141–182). San Diego: Academic Press. · DOI
  19. DiLalla, L. (2017). Behavioral genetics. In Oxford Bibliographies (September, 2017 ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199828340/obo-9780199828340-0010.xml
  20. Flege, J., & Fletcher, K. (1992). Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780 · DOI
  21. Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fujii, S., & Schlaug, G. (2013) The Harvard Beat Assessment Test (H-BAT): A battery for assessing beat perception and production and their dissociation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7:771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00771 · DOI
  23. Gordon, R. L., Shivers, C. M., Wieland, E. A., Kotz, S. A., Yoder, P. J., McAuley, J. D. (2015). Musical rhythm discrimination explains individual differences in grammar skills in children. Developmental Science, 18(4), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12230 · DOI
  24. Hambrick, D. Z., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2016). Beyond born versus made: A new look at expertise. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 64, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2015.09.001 · DOI
  25. Hambrick, D. Z., & Tucker-Drob, E. (2015). The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene-environment correlation and interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0671-9. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hansen, M., Wallentin, M., & Vuust, P. (2013). Working memory and musical competence of musicians and non-musicians. Psychology of Music, 41(6), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612452186 · DOI
  27. Herholz, S. C., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: Behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.011 · DOI
  28. Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9800123X · DOI
  29. Hutka, S., Bidelman, G. M., & Moreno, S. (2015). Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of music and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music. Neuropsychologia, 71, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.019 · DOI
  30. Jarosz, A., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  32. Johnson, E., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2007). Socioeconomic status and school grades: Placing their association in broader context in a sample of biological and adoptive families. Intelligence, 35(6), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.006 · DOI
  33. Jones, A. M. (1959). Studies in African music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  34. Krishnan, A., Gandour, J. T., Bidelman, G. M., & Swaminathan, J. (2009). Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem. NeuroReport, 20(4), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283263000 · DOI
  35. Law, L. N. C., & Zentner, M. (2012). Assessing musical abilities objectively: Construction and validation of the Profile of Music Perception Skills. PloS ONE, 7(12), e52508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052508 · DOI
  36. Lee, Y. S., Ahn, A., Holt, R. F., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2020). Rhythm and syntax processing in school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 56(9), 1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000969 · DOI
  37. Lumsden, R. (2010). Women’s leadership in Western music since 1800. In K. O’Connor (Ed.), Gender and women’s leadership: A reference handbook (pp. 917–925). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
  38. Magne, C., Jordan, D. K., Gordon, R. L. (2016) Speech rhythm sensitivity and musical aptitude: ERPs and individual differences. Brain and Language, 153–154, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.01.001 · DOI
  39. Mankel, K., Barber, J., & Bidelman, G. M. (2020). Auditory categorical processing for speech is modulated by inherent musical listening skills. NeuroReport, 31, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001369 · DOI
  40. Mankel, K., & Bidelman, G. M. (2018). Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(51), 13129–13134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811793115 · DOI
  41. Matthews, T. E., Thibodeau, J. N. L., Gunther, B. P., & Penhune, V. B. (2016) The impact of instrument-specific musical training on rhythm perception and production. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00069 · DOI
  42. Mattock, K., & Burnham, D. (2006). Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in1003_3 · DOI
  43. Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106(3), 1367–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.002 · DOI
  44. Meinz, E. J., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: The role of WMC. Psychological Science, 21(7), 914–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610373933. · DOI
  45. Mosing, M. A., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Ullén, F. (2014). Practice does not make perfect: No causal effect of music practice on music ability. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614541990 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mosing, M. A., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., & Ullén, F. (2016). Investigating cognitive transfer within the framework of music practice: Genetic pleiotropy rather than causality. Developmental Science, 19(3), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12306 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Mosing, M. A., & Ullén, F. (2018). Genetic influences on musical specialization: A twin study on choice of instrument and music genre. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1423, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13626 · DOI
  48. Penhune, V. B. (2011). Sensitive periods in human development: Evidence from musical training. Cortex, 47(9), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.010 · DOI
  49. Penhune, V. B. (2019). Music training and brain structure: The causes and consequences of training. In M. H. Thaut & D. A. Hodges (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music and the brain (pp. 419–438). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198804123.013.17 · DOI
  50. Penhune, V. B. (2020). A gene-maturation-environment model for understanding sensitive period effects in musical training. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 36, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.011 · DOI
  51. Penhune, V., & de Villers-Sidani, E. (2014). Time for new thinking about sensitive periods. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 8:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00055 · DOI
  52. Peretz, I., Champod, A. S., & Hyde, K. (2003). Varieties of musical disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 58– 75. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1284.006 · DOI
  53. Piro, J. M., & Oritz, C. (2009). The effect of piano lessons on the vocabulary and verbal sequencing skills of primary grade students. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097248 · DOI
  54. Roncaglia-Denissen, M. P., Roor, D. A., Chen, A., & Sadakata, M. (2016) The enhanced musical rhythmic perception in second language learners. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10:288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00288 · DOI
  55. Roncaglia-Denissen, M.P., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Heine, A., Vuust, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Enhanced musical rhythmic perception in Turkish early and late learners of German. Frontiers in Psychology, 4:645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00645 · DOI
  56. Schellenberg, E. G. (2006). Long-term positive associations between music lessons and IQ. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.457 · DOI
  57. Schellenberg, E. G. (2020). Music training, individual differences, and plasticity. In M. S. C. Thomas, D. Mareschal, & I. Dumontheil (Eds.), Educational neuroscience: Development across the lifespan (pp. 413–439). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016830 · DOI
  58. Seashore, C. (1919). The psychology of musical talent. New York, NY: Holt. · DOI
  59. Seashore, C. E., Saetveit, J. G., & Lewis, D. (1960). Seashore measures of musical talent (rev. ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
  60. Slevc, L. R., Davey, N. S., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2016). Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition, 152, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017 · DOI
  61. Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency. Psychological Science, 17, 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01765.x · DOI
  62. Steele, C. J., Bailey, J. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Penhune, V. B. (2013). Early musical training and white-matter plasticity in the corpus callosum: Evidence for a sensitive period. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(3), 1282–1290. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3578-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Steele, C. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2018). Practice makes plasticity. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 1645–1650. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0280-4 · DOI
  64. Stevens, C. J., Keller, P. E., & Tyler, M. D. (2013). Tonal language background and detecting pitch contour in spoken and musical items. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611415749 · DOI
  65. Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E.G. (2017). Musical competence and phoneme perception in a foreign language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1929–1934. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1244-5 · DOI
  66. Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E.G. (2018). Musical competence is predicted by music training, cognitive abilities, and personality. Scientific Reports, 8, 9223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27571-2 · DOI
  67. Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2019). Music training and cognitive abilities: Associations, causes, and consequences. In M. H. Thaut & D. A. Hodges (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music and the brain (pp. 645–670). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198804123.013.26 · DOI
  68. Swaminathan, S., Schellenberg, E. G., & Khalil, S. (2017). Revisiting the association between music lessons and intelligence: Training effects or music aptitude? Intelligence, 62, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Swaminathan, S., Schellenberg, E. G., & Venkatesan, K. (2018). Explaining the association between music training and reading in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(6), 992–999. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000493 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Theorell, T., Madison, G., & Ullén, F. (2019). Associations between musical aptitude, alexithymia, and working in a creative occupation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000158 · DOI
  71. Thomas, K. S., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Beaty, R. E., & Hodges, D. A. (2016). Openness to experience and auditory discrimination ability in music: An investment approach. Psychology of Music, 44(4), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615592013 · DOI
  72. Trainor, L. J. (2005). Are there critical periods for musical development? Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20059 · DOI
  73. Tsao, F.-M. (2017). Perceptual improvement of lexical tone in infants: Effects of tone language experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00558 · DOI
  74. Ullén, F., Mosing, M. A., Holm, L., Eriksson, H., & Madison, G. (2014). Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish Musical Discrimination Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.057 · DOI
  75. Vaquero, L., Rousseau, P.-N., Vozian, D., Klein, D., & Penhune, V. (2020). What you learn & when you learn it: Impact of early bilingual & music experience on the structural characteristics of auditory-motor pathways. NeuroImage, 213, 116689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116689 · DOI
  76. Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P. (2010a). The Musical Ear Test: A new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P. (2010b). Corrigendum to “The Musical Ear Test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence” [Learning and Individual Differences Volume 20 (3) 188–196]. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.001 · DOI
  78. Watanabe, D., Savion-Lemieux, T., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). The effect of early musical training on adult motor performance: Evidence for a sensitive period in motor learning. Experimental Brain Research, 176(2), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0619-z · DOI
  79. Wing, H. D. (1962). A revision of the Wing Musical Aptitude Test. Journal of Research in Music Education, 10(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3343909 · DOI
  80. Zhang, L., Xie, S. Li, Y., Shu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Perception of musical melody and rhythm as influenced by native language experience. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(5), EL385-EL390. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001179 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Swaminathan, S., Kragness, H. E., & Schellenberg, E. G.
ORCID
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
2007-2024
ISSN
1554-3528
DOI
10.3758/s13428-020-01528-8
Cited by
24
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review