Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability

Meir, Isaac A., Garb, Yaakov, Jiao, Dixin, Cicelsky, Alex·2009·Advances in Building Energy Research

Abstract

Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is a platform for the systematic study of buildings once occupied, so that lessons may be learned that will improve their current conditions and guide the design of future buildings. Various aspects of the occupied buildings’ functioning and performance can be assessed in a POE, both chemo-physical (indoor environment quality (IEQ), indoor air quality (IAQ) and thermal performance) as well as more subjective and interactional (space use, user satisfaction, etc.). POE draws on an extensive quantitative and qualitative toolkit: measurements and monitoring, on the one hand, and methods such as walk-throughs, observations and user satisfaction questionnaires on the other. POE may seem a necessary, indeed, axiomatic phase of the design and construction process, and exactly the kind of integrated assessment essential for the design of more sustainable buildings. Yet POE researchers have often been regarded with suspicion and even hostility, since their work may cause friction between different stakeholders. This chapter reviews material published in recent years in an attempt to trace the emergence of POE, describe its conceptual and methodological backdrop, its interaction with other issues related to sustainable design, and its increasing ‘canonization’ as a method. We argue that POE offers the potential to integrate a range of fragmented aspects of the construction process and of the relations of buildings to their environment and users. We propose that the acceptance of POE as a mandatory step in the design and commissioning of buildings, whose results are habitually fed backward and forward to other stages of the design and construction processes, is an important and probably inevitable step toward making buildings more sustainable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3763/aber.2009.0307

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Meir, I. A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., & Cicelsky, A.
Venue
Advances in Building Energy Research
Published
2009-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
189-219
ISSN
  • 1751-2549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2201
OpenAlex
W2125247113
Cited by
256
References
27
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3763/aber.2009.0307
The paper
Meir, I. A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., & Cicelsky, A. (2009). Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability. Advances in Building Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3763/aber.2009.0307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.