Cited by 7CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

CRISPR-Mediated Reorganization of Chromatin Loop Structure

Open access
Morgan, Stefanie L., Chang, Erin Y., Mariano, Natasha C., Bermudez, Abel, Arruda, Nicole L., Wu, Fanting, Luo, Yunhai, Shankar, Gautam +4 more·2018·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

Recent studies have clearly shown that long-range, three-dimensional chromatin looping interactions play a significant role in the regulation of gene expression, but whether looping is responsible for or a result of alterations in gene expression is still unknown. Until recently, how chromatin looping affects the regulation of gene activity and cellular function has been relatively ambiguous, and limitations in existing methods to manipulate these structures prevented in-depth exploration of these interactions. To resolve this uncertainty, we engineered a method for selective and reversible chromatin loop re-organization using CRISPR-dCas9 (CLOuD9). The dynamism of the CLOuD9 system has been demonstrated by successful localization of CLOuD9 constructs to target genomic loci to modulate local chromatin conformation. Importantly, the ability to reverse the induced contact and restore the endogenous chromatin conformation has also been confirmed. Modulation of gene expression with this method establishes the capacity to regulate cellular gene expression and underscores the great potential for applications of this technology in creating stable de novo chromatin loops that markedly affect gene expression in the contexts of cancer and development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/57457

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forced looping between these loci could also be achieved in HEK293 cells, in which they are heterochromatic, but in this case β-globin derepression was not achieved.

    “Forced looping between these loci could also be achieved in HEK293 cells, in which they are heterochromatic, but in this case β-globin derepression was not achieved [313].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [313]

    The Representative Results report induced β-globin–LCR contacts in heterochromatic HEK 293T cells, without an increase in β-globin expression. The cited experiments used HEK 293T cells specifically, whereas the claim identifies them as HEK293 cells. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Forced looping between β-globin and its LCR was shown to rescue β-globin expression in K562 erythroid cells (which instead aberrantly express γ-globin) in a reversible manner.

    “Forced looping between β-globin and its LCR was shown to rescue β-globin expression in K562 erythroid cells (which instead aberrantly express γ-globin) in a reversible manner [313].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent. Invitrogen by Life Technologies (2013).
  2. DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit Handbook. QIAGEN (2006).
  3. Determining Genome Targeting Efficiency using T7 Endonuclase I (M0302). New England BioLabs (2016).
  4. RNeasy Mini Handbook. QIAGEN. (2012).
  5. SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Product Information Sheet. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, S. L., Chang, E. Y., Mariano, N. C., Bermudez, A., Arruda, N. L., Wu, F., Luo, Y., Shankar, G., Huynh, S. K., Huang, C.-C., Pitteri, S. J., & Wang, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Bridgewater State University (US)
  • System Biosciences (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2018-09-14
Issue
139
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889929670
Cited by
7
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (F99CA222541)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (27302C0028)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
chromatin looping, three-dimensional chromatin structure, CRISPR/dCas9, gene expression regulation, long-range chromatin interactions
MeSH terms
Chromatin, Humans, Molecular Conformation, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review