Cited by 1Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver physiology and pathologyDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

In Vitro Modeling of Fat Deposition in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Bao, Qinglan, Zhang, Xiaoxiao, Chen, Yingsong, Wang, Tegexibaiyin, Siqin, Bateer·2024·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has surged due to changes in economic and lifestyle patterns, leading to significant health challenges. Previous reports have studied the establishment of animal and cellular models for MASLD, highlighting differences between them. In this study, a cellular model was created by inducing fat accumulation in MASLD. HepG2 cells were stimulated with the unsaturated fatty acid oleic acid at various concentrations (0.125 mM, 0.25 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM) to emulate MASLD. The model's efficacy was assessed using cell counting kit-8 assays, Oil Red O staining, and lipid content analysis. This study aimed to create a simple-to-operate cellular model for MASLD cells. Results from the cell counting kit-8 assays showed that the survival of HepG2 cells was dependent on the concentration of oleic acid, with a GI50 of 1.875 mM. Cell viability in the 0.5 mM and 1 mM groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, Oil Red O staining and lipid content analysis examined fat deposition at varying oleic acid concentrations (0.125 mM, 0.25 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM) on HepG2 cells. The lipid content of the 0.25 mM, 0.5 mM, and 1 mM groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, triglyceride levels in the OA groups were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/66810

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To induce steatosis in HepG2, supraphysiological concentrations of FFAs (0.5-2.0 mM) are often used.

    “Second, to induce steatosis, supraphysiological concentrations of FFAs (concentrations of 0.5–2.0 mM) are often used in HepG2 experiments [28,91,125,126,127,128,129,130].”
  • The range of 0.1 to 2.0 mM for the combination of FAs is the standard range for modeling MASLD in 2D HepG2 monoculture.

    “The range of 0.1 to 2.0 mM for the combination of FAs is the standard range for modeling MASLD in 2D HepG2 monoculture [93,100,125,126,127,128].”
  • In HepG2 cells, treatment with OA at concentrations of 0.125-0.25 mM induces significant triglyceride accumulation without a decrease in viability, whereas concentrations ≥ 0.5 mM already exhibit signs of toxicity.

    “Thus, in HepG2 cells, treatment with OA at concentrations of 0.125–0.25 mM induces significant triglyceride accumulation without a decrease in viability, whereas concentrations ≥ 0.5 mM already exhibit signs of toxicity [126,128,156].”
  • Fatty acids are conjugated with bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1-4.5%, or fat-free BSA) to ensure solubility and mimic physiological transport; alternatively, DMSO is used.

    “Fatty acids are conjugated with bovine serum albumin (BSA, 1–4.5%, or fat-free BSA) to ensure solubility and mimic physiological transport. Alternatively, DMSO is used [128].”
  • In 2D monocultures, FFA concentrations of 0.5-2.0 mM are more commonly used, which are higher than physiological values; this is a widely accepted compromise that allows for steatosis to be induced in a short amount of time (24-48 h).

    “In 2D monocultures, concentrations of 0.5–2.0 mM are more commonly used, which are higher than physiological values [28,125,126,127,128]. This is a widely accepted compromise that allows for steatosis to be induced in a short amount of time (24–48 h).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, Q., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Wang, T., & Siqin, B.
Affiliations
Inner Mongolia Medical University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2024-07-19
Issue
209
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400861252
Cited by
1
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cell model, fat deposition, oleic acid, HepG2 cells, hepatocyte lipid accumulation, triglyceride levels, cell viability, in vitro disease model
MeSH terms
Azo Compounds, Fatty Liver, Humans, Models, Biological, Oleic Acid, Lipid Metabolism, Hep G2 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review