Cited by 111Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Comparing environmental impacts of natural inert and recycled construction and demolition waste processing using LCA

Open access
Simion, Isabela Maria, Fortuna, Maria Emiliana, Bonoli, Alessandra, Gavrilescu, Maria·2013·Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management

Abstract

Construction and demolition wastes (C&DW) are usually recognized as not dangerous, but their accumulation can generate serious environmental problems. In spite of C&DW high potential to be reused/recycled, the practical procedures need to be assessed in terms of environmental consequences. The objective of this study is to quantify the environmental impacts of C&DW recycling/reuse, specifically in the production of aggregate 0/30 mm, comparative to those generated during the natural inert processing, in terms of global impacts addressing the whole process and for each technological phase. The analysis was carried out using Life Cycle Assessment methodology, assisted by SimaPro software, and based on primary data collected directly from the Italian Emilia Romagna region. Three methods were used for impact quantification: Eco-Indicator 99, EDIP/UMIP and Cumulative Energy Demand. The analysis revealed that the environmental impacts generated by C&DW recycling/reuse accounting for about 40% of the impacts induced by natural inert processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3846/16486897.2013.852558

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bonoli, A.; Garfì, M. 2008. The recycling of construction and demolition waste: the quality standards for the reuse in con- struction field, in REWAS 2008, Global Simposium on Recy- cling, Waste Treatment and Clean Technology proceedings, WARRENDALE PA, TMS, 1163-1169.
  2. Cupo-Pagano, M.; D'Andrea, A.; Giavarini, C.; Marro, C. 1994. Use of building demolition waste for asphalt mixes: first results, in Energy, Environment and Technological In- novation -Proceedings of III International Congress, 5-11 November, 1994, Caracas -Venezuela, 203-208.
  3. D'Andrea, A. 1999. Aggregates recycling: characteristics, fields use, recycling of inert waste in construction, in Proceedings of the National Conference, Palermo, 81-103 (in Italian).
  4. EC Directive. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Par- liament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives, Official Journal of the European Union L 312: 3-30.
  5. Pittalis, C. 2009. Inert waste from C & D: technologie recycling and applicazionie of LCA methodology for the production of stabilized inert 0/30 mm: PhD Thesis. Coordinator Bono- li, A. Faculty of Inginery, Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna.
  6. Simion, I. M.; Fortuna, M. E.; Gavrilescu, M. 2012. Use of sus- tainable indicators in solid waste management -a review, Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Iasi, Tome LVIII (LXII), Fasc. 1, 57-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simion, I. M., Fortuna, M. E., Bonoli, A., & Gavrilescu, M.
Affiliations
  • Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași (RO)
  • Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 73 Prof Dr Docent Dimitrie Mangeron Street, 700050 Iasi, Romania
  • DICAM, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Studies of Bologna, 2 Risorgimento Street, 40136 Bologna, Italy
  • Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management
Published
2013-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
273-287
ISSN
  • 1648-6897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1822-4199
OpenAlex
W2063292004
Cited by
111
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Autoritatea Natională pentru Cercetare Stiintifică
  • Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
construction and demolition waste, waste recycling, waste reuse, aggregate production, environmental impact, life cycle assessment, cumulative energy demand, Eco-indicator 99, Emilia-Romagna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review