The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DETECTION OF THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AND HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS
Open accessAbstract
We show that the projected number density profiles of Sloan Digital Sky Survey photometric galaxies around galaxy clusters display strong evidence for the splashback radius, a sharp halo edge corresponding to the location of the first orbital apocenter of satellite galaxies after their infall. We split the clusters into two subsamples with different mean projected radial distances of their members, , at fixed richness and redshift. The sample with smaller has a smaller ratio of the splashback radius to the traditional halo boundary than the subsample with larger , indicative of different mass accretion rates for these subsamples. The same subsamples were recently used by Miyatake et al. to show that their large-scale clustering differs despite their similar weak lensing masses, demonstrating strong evidence for halo assembly bias. We expand on this result by presenting a 6.6 σ difference in the clustering amplitudes of these samples using cluster–photometric galaxy cross-correlations. This measurement is a clear indication that halo clustering depends on parameters other than halo mass. If is related to the mass assembly history of halos, the measurement is a manifestation of the halo assembly bias. However, our measured splashback radii are smaller, while the strength of the assembly bias signal is stronger, than the predictions of collisionless Λ cold dark matter simulations. We show that dynamical friction, cluster mis-centering, or projection effects are not likely to be the sole source of these discrepancies. However, further investigations regarding unknown catastrophic weak lensing or cluster identification systematics are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×
“…law in the outer regions, is able to reproduce the dark matter profile around halos, and is flexible enough to reproduce the simulation results compared to other fitting formulae such as the Navarro–Frenk–White model and the halo model (Navarro et al. 1996; Oguri & Hamana 2011; Hikage et al. 2013).”
ResultThe statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles
Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F., & Heß, S. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw248 · Cited by 970
Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions
Kahlhoefer, F., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., Frandsen, M. T., & Sarkar, S. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2097 · Cited by 207
Cited by
The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts
Ade, P., Aguirre, J., Ahmed, Z., Aiola, S., Ali, A., Alonso, D., Alvarez, M. A., Arnold, K., Ashton, P., Austermann, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 · Cited by 1,519
Self-citationUniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 · Cited by 1,243
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
COLOSSUS: A Python Toolkit for Cosmology, Large-scale Structure, and Dark Matter Halos
Diemer, B. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- More, S., Miyatake, H., Takada, M., Diemer, B., Kravtsov, A. V., Dalal, N. K., More, A., Murata, R., Mandelbaum, R., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Oguri, M., & Spergel, D. N.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 825
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2289541820
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DETECTION OF THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AND HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/39
- The paper
- More, S., Miyatake, H., Takada, M., Diemer, B., Kravtsov, A. V., Dalal, N. K., More, A., Murata, R., Mandelbaum, R., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Oguri, M., & Spergel, D. N. (2016). DETECTION OF THE SPLASHBACK RADIUS AND HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS OF MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.