Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Target Selection for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2 Survey

Open access
Zasowski, G., Cohen, R. E., Chojnowski, S. D., Santana, F., Oelkers, R. J., Andrews, B., Beaton, R. L., Bender, C., Bird, J. C., Bovy, J., Carlberg, J. K., Covey, K., Cunha, K., Dell’Agli, F., Fleming, Scott W., Frinchaboy, P. M., García-Hernández, D. A., Harding, P., Holtzman, J., Johnson, J. A., Kollmeier, J. A., Majewski, S. R., Mészáros, Sz., Munn, J., Muñoz, R. R., Ness, M. K., Nidever, D. L., Poleski, R., Román-Zúñiga, C., Shetrone, M., Simon, J. D., Smith, V. V., Sobeck, J. S., Stringfellow, G. S., Szigetiáros, L., Tayar, J., Troup, N.·2017·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

APOGEE-2 is a high-resolution, near-infrared spectroscopic survey observing ∼3 × 10 5 stars across the entire sky. It is the successor to APOGEE and is part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV). APOGEE-2 is expanding on APOGEE’s goals of addressing critical questions of stellar astrophysics, stellar populations, and Galactic chemodynamical evolution using (1) an enhanced set of target types and (2) a second spectrograph at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. APOGEE-2 is targeting red giant branch and red clump stars, RR Lyrae, low-mass dwarf stars, young stellar objects, and numerous other Milky Way and Local Group sources across the entire sky from both hemispheres. In this paper, we describe the APOGEE-2 observational design, target selection catalogs and algorithms, and the targeting-related documentation included in the SDSS data releases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8df9

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Zasowski, G., Cohen, R. E., Chojnowski, S. D., Santana, F., Oelkers, R. J., Andrews, B., Beaton, R. L., Bender, C., Bird, J. C., Bovy, J., Carlberg, J. K., Covey, K., Cunha, K., Dell’Agli, F., Fleming, S. W., Frinchaboy, P. M., García-Hernández, D. A., Harding, P., Holtzman, J., Johnson, J. A., Kollmeier, J. A., Majewski, S. R., Mészáros, S., Munn, J., Muñoz, R. R., Ness, M. K., Nidever, D. L., Poleski, R., Román-Zúñiga, C., Shetrone, M., Simon, J. D., Smith, V. V., Sobeck, J. S., Stringfellow, G. S., Szigetiáros, L., Tayar, J., & Troup, N.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2017-10-25
Volume
154
Issue
5
Pages
198
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2740853133
Cited by
285
References
134
FWCI
16.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Target Selection for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2 Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-3881/aa8df9
The paper
Zasowski, G., Cohen, R. E., Chojnowski, S. D., Santana, F., Oelkers, R. J., Andrews, B., Beaton, R. L., Bender, C., Bird, J. C., Bovy, J., Carlberg, J. K., Covey, K., Cunha, K., Dell’Agli, F., Fleming, S. W., Frinchaboy, P. M., García-Hernández, D. A., Harding, P., Holtzman, J., . . . Troup, N. (2017). Target Selection for the SDSS-IV APOGEE-2 Survey. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa8df9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.