The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure
Open accessAbstract
In the ΛCDM paradigm, the Galactic stellar halo is predicted to harbor the accreted debris of smaller systems. To identify these systems, the H3 Spectroscopic Survey, combined with Gaia, is gathering 6D phase-space and chemical information in the distant Galaxy. Here we present a comprehensive inventory of structure within 50 kpc from the Galactic center using a sample of 5684 giants at and . We identify known structures including the high-α disk, the in situ halo (disk stars heated to eccentric orbits), Sagittarius (Sgr), Gaia–Sausage–Enceladus (GSE), the Helmi Streams, Sequoia, and Thamnos. Additionally, we identify the following new structures: (i) Aleph ([Fe/H] = −0.5), a low-eccentricity structure that rises a surprising 10 kpc off the plane, (ii) and (iii) Arjuna ([Fe/H] = −1.2) and I’itoi ([Fe/H] < −2), which comprise the high-energy retrograde halo along with Sequoia, and (iv) Wukong ([Fe/H] = −1.6), a prograde phase-space overdensity chemically distinct from GSE. For each structure, we provide [Fe/H], [α/Fe], and orbital parameters. Stars born within the Galaxy are a major component at (≈60%), but their relative fraction declines sharply to ≲5% past 15 kpc. Beyond 15 kpc, >80% of the halo is built by two massive (M ⋆ ∼ 10 8–10 9 M ⊙) accreted dwarfs: GSE ([Fe/H] = −1.2) within 25 kpc and Sgr ([Fe/H] = −1.0) beyond 25 kpc. This explains the relatively high overall metallicity of the halo ([Fe/H] ≈ −1.2). We attribute ≳95% of the sample to one of the listed structures, pointing to a halo built entirely from accreted dwarfs and heating of the disk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430
Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy
The Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., Greenfield, P., Droettboom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T., Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., et al. (2013) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 · Cited by 14,620
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the contents and survey properties
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., Eyer, L., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 · Cited by 8,442
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 · Cited by 6,946
Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375 · cited 1×
“In the third panel, we depict a summary of actions in the form of (Jz–JR)/Jtot versus Jf/Jtot following Binney & Tremaine (2008) and Vasiliev (2019).”
MethodIPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing
Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.53 · Cited by 4,009
Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions
Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., De Lee, N., Majewski, S. R., Nidever, D. L., Troup, N., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., García-Hernández, D. A., Longa-Peña, P., et al. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aac387 · Cited by 3,756
Metadata
- Authors
- Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., Johnson, B. D., Ting 丁, Y.-S. 源., Caldwell, N., Zaritsky, D., & Cargile, P. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 901
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W3035650334
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 217
- FWCI
- 23.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4
- The paper
- Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., Johnson, B. D., Ting 丁, Y.-S. 源., Caldwell, N., Zaritsky, D., & Cargile, P. A. (2020). Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.