Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure

Open access
Naidu, Rohan P., Conroy, Charlie, Bonaca, Ana, Johnson, Benjamin D., Ting 丁, Yuan-Sen 源森, Caldwell, Nelson, Zaritsky, Dennis, Cargile, Phillip A.·2020·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

In the ΛCDM paradigm, the Galactic stellar halo is predicted to harbor the accreted debris of smaller systems. To identify these systems, the H3 Spectroscopic Survey, combined with Gaia, is gathering 6D phase-space and chemical information in the distant Galaxy. Here we present a comprehensive inventory of structure within 50 kpc from the Galactic center using a sample of 5684 giants at and . We identify known structures including the high-α disk, the in situ halo (disk stars heated to eccentric orbits), Sagittarius (Sgr), Gaia–Sausage–Enceladus (GSE), the Helmi Streams, Sequoia, and Thamnos. Additionally, we identify the following new structures: (i) Aleph ([Fe/H] = −0.5), a low-eccentricity structure that rises a surprising 10 kpc off the plane, (ii) and (iii) Arjuna ([Fe/H] = −1.2) and I’itoi ([Fe/H] < −2), which comprise the high-energy retrograde halo along with Sequoia, and (iv) Wukong ([Fe/H] = −1.6), a prograde phase-space overdensity chemically distinct from GSE. For each structure, we provide [Fe/H], [α/Fe], and orbital parameters. Stars born within the Galaxy are a major component at (≈60%), but their relative fraction declines sharply to ≲5% past 15 kpc. Beyond 15 kpc, >80% of the halo is built by two massive (M ⋆ ∼ 10 8–10 9 M ⊙) accreted dwarfs: GSE ([Fe/H] = −1.2) within 25 kpc and Sgr ([Fe/H] = −1.0) beyond 25 kpc. This explains the relatively high overall metallicity of the halo ([Fe/H] ≈ −1.2). We attribute ≳95% of the sample to one of the listed structures, pointing to a halo built entirely from accreted dwarfs and heating of the disk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 217 references

Metadata

Authors
Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., Johnson, B. D., Ting 丁, Y.-S. 源., Caldwell, N., Zaritsky, D., & Cargile, P. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
901
Issue
1
Pages
48
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3035650334
Cited by
389
References
217
FWCI
23.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4
The paper
Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., Johnson, B. D., Ting 丁, Y.-S. 源., Caldwell, N., Zaritsky, D., & Cargile, P. A. (2020). Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.