Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions

Open access
Price-Whelan, Adrian M., Hogg, David W., Rix, Hans-Walter, De Lee, Nathan, Majewski, Steven R., Nidever, David L., Troup, Nicholas, Fernández-Trincado, José G., García-Hernández, Domingo A., Longa-Peña, Penélope, Nitschelm, Christian, Sobeck, Jennifer, Zamora, Olga·2018·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

Multi-epoch radial velocity measurements of stars can be used to identify stellar, substellar, and planetary-mass companions. Even a small number of observation epochs can be informative about companions, though there can be multiple qualitatively different orbital solutions that fit the data. We have custom-built a Monte Carlo sampler (The Joker) that delivers reliable (and often highly multimodal) posterior samplings for companion orbital parameters given sparse radial velocity data. Here we use The Joker to perform a search for companions to 96,231 red giant stars observed in the APOGEE survey (DR14) with ≥3 spectroscopic epochs. We select stars with probable companions by making a cut on our posterior belief about the amplitude of the variation in stellar radial velocity induced by the orbit. We provide (1) a catalog of 320 companions for which the stellar companion’s properties can be confidently determined, (2) a catalog of 4898 stars that likely have companions, but would require more observations to uniquely determine the orbital properties, and (3) posterior samplings for the full orbital parameters for all stars in the parent sample. We show the characteristics of systems with confidently determined companion properties and highlight interesting systems with candidate compact object companions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/aac387

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Abolfathi, 2018, ApJS, 235, 42, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a · DOI · Paper page
  2. Badenes, 2018, ApJ, 854, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa765 · DOI
  3. Bianchi, 2011, Ap&SS, 335, 161, 10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Blanton, 2017, AJ, 154, 28, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 · DOI · Paper page
  5. De Lee, 2013, AJ, 145, 155, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/6/155 · DOI
  6. Duchêne, 2013, ARA&A, 51, 269, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Duquennoy, 1991, A&AS, 88, 281
  8. Eggleton, 1983, ApJ, 268, 368, 10.1086/160960 · DOI · Paper page
  9. El-Badry, 2018, MNRAS, 476, 528, 10.1093/mnras/sty240 · DOI
  10. Foreman-Mackey, 2013, PASP, 125, 306, 10.1086/670067 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Foreman-Mackey, 2014, ApJ, 795, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/64 · DOI · Paper page
  12. García Pérez, 2016, AJ, 151, 144, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/144 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gelman, 1992, StaSc, 7, 457, 10.1214/ss/1177011136 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Goodman, 2010, Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, 5, 65, 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gunn, 2006, AJ, 131, 2332, 10.1086/500975 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hekker, 2008, A&A, 480, 215, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078321 · DOI
  17. Hogg, 2018, ApJS, 236, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab76e · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hogg, 2010, ApJ, 725, 2166, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2166 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Huber, 2011, ApJ, 743, 143, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/143 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kipping, 2013, MNRAS, 434, L51, 10.1093/mnrasl/slt075 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lloyd, 1982, ITIT, 28, 129, 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Martig, 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3655, 10.1093/mnras/stv2830 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Moe, 2017, ApJS, 230, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ness, 2016, ApJ, 823, 114, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/114 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ness, 2015, ApJ, 808, 16, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/16 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nidever, 2015, AJ, 150, 173, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/173 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pedregosa, 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825
  28. Pérez, 2007, CSE, 9, 21, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Price-Whelan, 2017, JOSS, 2, 357, 10.21105/joss.00357 · DOI
  30. Price-Whelan, 2017, ApJ, 837, 20, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5e50 · DOI
  31. Raghavan, 2010, ApJS, 190, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Serenelli, 2017, ApJS, 233, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa97df · DOI
  33. Ting, 2018, ApJL, 858, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/aabf8e · DOI
  34. Tokovinin, 2014, AJ, 147, 86, 10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/86 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tokovinin, 2018, ApJS, 235, 6, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa1a5 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa1a5
  36. Troup, 2016, AJ, 151, 85, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/85 · DOI
  37. Van der Walt, 2011, CSE, 13, 22, 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 3,756

Metadata

Authors
Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., De Lee, N., Majewski, S. R., Nidever, D. L., Troup, N., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., García-Hernández, D. A., Longa-Peña, P., Nitschelm, C., Sobeck, J., & Zamora, O.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2018-06-18
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
18
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2797439311
Cited by
3,756
References
4
FWCI
204.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-3881/aac387
The paper
Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., De Lee, N., Majewski, S. R., Nidever, D. L., Troup, N., Fernández-Trincado, J. G., García-Hernández, D. A., Longa-Peña, P., Nitschelm, C., Sobeck, J., & Zamora, O. (2018). Binary Companions of Evolved Stars in APOGEE DR14: Search Method and Catalog of ∼5000 Companions. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aac387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.