Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways

Open access
Zevin, Michael, Bavera, Simone S., Berry, Christopher P. L., Kalogera, Vicky, Fragos, Tassos, Marchant, Pablo, Rodriguez, Carl L., Antonini, Fabio, Holz, Daniel E., Pankow, Chris·2021·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The second LIGO–Virgo catalog of gravitational-wave (GW) transients has more than quadrupled the observational sample of binary black holes. We analyze this catalog using a suite of five state-of-the-art binary black hole population models covering a range of isolated and dynamical formation channels and infer branching fractions between channels as well as constraints on uncertain physical processes that impact the observational properties of mergers. Given our set of formation models, we find significant differences between the branching fractions of the underlying and detectable populations, and the diversity of detections suggests that multiple formation channels are at play. A mixture of channels is strongly preferred over any single channel dominating the detected population: an individual channel does not contribute to more than ≃70% of the observational sample of binary black holes. We calculate the preference between the natal spin assumptions and common-envelope efficiencies in our models, favoring natal spins of isolated black holes of ≲0.1 and marginally preferring common-envelope efficiencies of ≳2.0 while strongly disfavoring highly inefficient common envelopes. We show that it is essential to consider multiple channels when interpreting GW catalogs, as inference on branching fractions and physical prescriptions becomes biased when contributing formation scenarios are not considered or incorrect physical prescriptions are assumed. Although our quantitative results can be affected by uncertain assumptions in model predictions, our methodology is capable of including models with updated theoretical considerations and additional formation channels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Zevin, M., Bavera, S. S., Berry, C. P. L., Kalogera, V., Fragos, T., Marchant, P., Rodriguez, C. L., Antonini, F., Holz, D. E., & Pankow, C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
910
Issue
2
Pages
152
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3109088998
Cited by
320
References
143
FWCI
30.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e
The paper
Zevin, M., Bavera, S. S., Berry, C. P. L., Kalogera, V., Fragos, T., Marchant, P., Rodriguez, C. L., Antonini, F., Holz, D. E., & Pankow, C. (2021). One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.