Misaligned Jets from Sgr A* and the Origin of Fermi/eROSITA Bubbles
Open accessAbstract
One of the leading explanations for the origin of Fermi Bubbles is past jet activity in the Galactic center supermassive black hole Sgr A*. The claimed jets are often assumed to be perpendicular to the Galactic plane. Motivated by the orientation of pc-scale nuclear stellar disk and gas streams, as well as a low inclination of the accretion disk around Sgr A* inferred by the Event Horizon Telescope, we perform hydrodynamical simulations of nuclear jets significantly tilted relative to the Galactic rotation axis. The observed axisymmetry and hemisymmetry (north–south symmetry) of Fermi/eROSITA bubbles (FEBs) due to quasi-steady jets in Sgr A* could be produced if the jet had a super-Eddington power (≳5 × 10 44 erg s−1) for a short time (jet active period ≲6 kyr) for a reasonable jet opening angle (≲10°). Such powerful explosions are, however, incompatible with the observed O viii/O vii line ratio toward the bubbles, even after considering electron–proton temperature nonequilibrium. We argue that the only remaining options for producing FEBs are (i) a low-luminosity (≈10 40.5−41 erg s−1) magnetically dominated jet or accretion wind from the Sgr A*, or (ii) a supernovae or tidal disruption event driven wind of a similar luminosity from the Galactic center.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sarkar et al. (2023) showed that for the Milky Way circumgalactic medium profile, the electron-proton equilibrium time scale is about 1 Myr and is independent of the shock Mach number.
“Sarkar et al. (2023) showed that for the Milky Way CGM profile, t ep ∼ 1 Myr and it is independent of the shock Mach number.”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
Such short-duration jets would choke before they can escape the ISM (scale height ∼200 pc), therefore, effectively creating a blast-wave-like evolution of the forward shock.
“Such short-duration jets would choke before they can escape the ISM (scale height ∼ 200 pc), therefore, effectively creating a blast-wave-like evolution of the forward shock (Yang et al. 2022; Sarkar et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
Jets would not be able to produce the axisymmetry and hemispherical symmetry of the FEBs.
“would not be able to produce the axisymmetry and hemispherical symmetry of the FEBs (Sarkar et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
For magnetic kink instability to occur within the ISM (scale height H pc), one must have L_jet < L_MKI = 4e41 erg/s (n_ism)(H/200pc)^2.
“For magnetic kink-instability to occur within the ISM (scale height, H pc), one must have L jet < L MKI = 4 × 10 41 erg s -1 n ism H 2 200 pc , where n ism is the ISM particle density (Tchekhovskoy & Bromberg 2016; Sarkar et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
Even if the TDE produces a jet, the jet would only propagate a distance of z_tde ∼ v_h,jet t_tde ∼1 pc, very similar to the simple wind-like outflow from the TDE.
“Additionally, it can also be shown that even if the TDE produces a jet, the jet would only propagate a distance of z tde ∼ vh , jet t tde ∼ 1 pc, very similar to the simple wind-like outflow from the TDE (Sarkar et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
The shock temperature of such a high-energy explosion is inconsistent with the O viii/O ii line ratio observations.
“The shock temperature of such a high-energy explosion is, however, inconsistent with the O viii / O ii line ratio observations (Sarkar et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Sarkar et al. 2023
Cites
The Two Young Star Disks in the Central Parsec of the Galaxy: Properties, Dynamics, and Formation
Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., Nayakshin, S., Beloborodov, A. M., Levin, Y., Trippe, S., Eisenhauer, F., Ott, T., Gillessen, S., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/503273 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
EVIDENCE FOR WARPED DISKS OF YOUNG STARS IN THE GALACTIC CENTER
Bartko, H., Martins, F., Fritz, T. K., Genzel, R., Levin, Y., Perets, H. B., Paumard, T., Nayakshin, S., Gerhard, O., Alexander, T., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1741 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
CONSTRAINING THE MILKY WAY'S HOT GAS HALO WITH O VII AND O VIII EMISSION LINES
Miller, M. J., & Bregman, J. N. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/14 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Yuan, F., Bu, D., & Wu, M. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/130 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Detection of large-scale X-ray bubbles in the Milky Way halo
Predehl, P., Sunyaev, R. A., Becker, W., Brunner, H., Burenin, R., Bykov, A., Cherepashchuk, A., Chugai, N., Churazov, E., Doroshenko, V., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2979-0 · Cited by 234 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The recent discovery of X-ray structures in the southern Galactic hemisphere by e-Rosita (Predehl et al. 2020), which appear to be the counterparts of the known X-ray features in the northern hemisphere, has reignited the quest for the origin of the Fermi/ eROSITA bubbles (FEBs).”
BackgroundGiustini, M., & Proga, D. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833810 · Cited by 166 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in such a low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN) the feedback is mostly dominated by jets rather than by winds (Yuan et al. 2012; Yuan & Narayan 2014; Giustini & Proga 2019).”
BackgroundAn X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the Galactic Centre
Ponti, G., Hofmann, F., Churazov, E., Morris, M. R., Haberl, F., Nandra, K., Terrier, R., Clavel, M., & Goldwurm, A. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1009-6 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Crocker, R. M., Bicknell, G. V., Taylor, A. M., & Carretti, E. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/107 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
THE INTERACTION OF THE FERMI BUBBLES WITH THE MILKY WAY’S HOT GAS HALO
Miller, M. J., & Bregman, J. N. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/9 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Clues to the origin of Fermi bubbles from O viii/O vii line ratio
Sarkar, K. C., Nath, B. B., & Sharma, P. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx314 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationPossible connection between the asymmetry of the North Polar Spur and Loop I and Fermi bubbles
Sarkar, K. C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2944 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“For magnetic kink-instability to occur within the ISM (scale height, H pc), one must have , where n ism is the ISM particle density (Tchekhovskoy & Bromberg 2016; Sarkar et al. 2023).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Sarkar, K. C., Mondal, S., Sharma, P., & Piran, T.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IN)
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Sarkar, Kartick C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2023-07-01
- Volume
- 951
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W4382938010
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STE 1869/2-1 GE 625/17-1)
- Israel Science Foundation (2190/20)
- DST ∣ Science and Engineering Research Board (RJF/2020/000113)
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DST/SJF/PSA-03/2016-17)
- EC ∣ European Research Council (TRex)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- Fermi bubbles, Sgr A*, supermassive black hole jets, misaligned jets, jet orientation, fluid simulation, accretion winds, supernovae, tidal disruption, Galactic Center
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review