Cited by 111Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifeStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesPlanetary Science and Exploration

IDENTIFYING PLANETARY BIOSIGNATURE IMPOSTORS: SPECTRAL FEATURES OF CO AND O 4 RESULTING FROM ABIOTIC O 2 /O 3 PRODUCTION

Open access
Schwieterman, Edward W., Meadows, Victoria S., Domagal-Goldman, Shawn D., Deming, Drake, Arney, Giada N., Luger, Rodrigo, Harman, Chester E., Misra, Amit +1 more·2016·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

O 2 and O 3 have been long considered the most robust individual biosignature gases in a planetary atmosphere, yet multiple mechanisms that may produce them in the absence of life have been described. However, these abiotic planetary mechanisms modify the environment in potentially identifiable ways. Here we briefly discuss two of the most detectable spectral discriminants for abiotic O 2 /O 3 : CO and O 4 . We produce the first explicit self-consistent simulations of these spectral discriminants as they may be seen by James Webb Space Telescope ( JWST ). If JWST -NIRISS and/or NIRSpec observe CO (2.35, 4.6 μ m) in conjunction with CO 2 (1.6, 2.0, 4.3 μ m) in the transmission spectrum of a terrestrial planet it could indicate robust CO 2 photolysis and suggest that a future detection of O 2 or O 3 might not be biogenic. Strong O 4 bands seen in transmission at 1.06 and 1.27 μ m could be diagnostic of a post-runaway O 2 -dominated atmosphere from massive H-escape. We find that for these false positive scenarios, CO at 2.35 μ m, CO 2 at 2.0 and 4.3 μ m, and O 4 at 1.27 μ m are all stronger features in transmission than O 2 /O 3 and could be detected with S/Ns ≳ 3 for an Earth-size planet orbiting a nearby M dwarf star with as few as 10 transits, assuming photon-limited noise. O 4 bands could also be sought in UV/VIS/NIR reflected light (at 0.345, 0.36, 0.38, 0.445, 0.475, 0.53, 0.57, 0.63, 1.06, and 1.27 μ m) by a next generation direct-imaging telescope such as LUVOIR/HDST or HabEx and would indicate an oxygen atmosphere too massive to be biologically produced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8205/819/1/l13

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwieterman, E. W., Meadows, V. S., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Deming, D., Arney, G. N., Luger, R., Harman, C. E., Misra, A., & Barnes, R.
Affiliations
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2016-02-25
Volume
819
Issue
1
Pages
L13
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2279598166
Cited by
111
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNA13AA93A, NNH12ZDA002C)
  • University of Washington
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute (NNH12ZDA002C, NNA13AA93A)
  • Astrophysics Division
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
ozone, carbon monoxide, CO2 photolysis, runaway greenhouse, hydrogen escape, transmission spectroscopy, James Webb Space Telescope, terrestrial exoplanets, M dwarfs, false positives, reflectance spectroscopy, direct imaging, LUVOIR, HabEx

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review