Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the Habitability of the TRAPPIST-1 System Using a 3D Climate Model

Wolf, Eric T.·2017·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

The TRAPPIST-1 system provides an extraordinary opportunity to study multiple terrestrial extrasolar planets and their atmospheres. Here, we use the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 4 to study the possible climate and habitability of the planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system. We assume the worlds are ocean-covered, with atmospheres composed of N 2, CO 2, and H 2 O, and with orbital and geophysical properties defined from observation. Model results indicate that the inner three planets (b, c, and d) presently reside interior to the inner edge of the traditional liquid water habitable zone. Thus, if water ever existed on the inner planets, they would have undergone a runaway greenhouse and lost their water to space, leaving them dry today. Conversely, the outer three planets (f, g, and h) fall beyond the maximum CO 2 greenhouse outer edge of the habitable zone. Model results indicate that the outer planets cannot be warmed, despite having as much as 30 bar CO 2 atmospheres, instead entering a snowball state. The middle planet (e) represents the best chance for a presently habitable ocean-covered world in the TRAPPIST-1 system. Planet e can maintain at least some habitable surface area with 0–2 bar CO 2, depending on the background N 2 content. Near-present-day Earth surface temperatures can be maintained for an ocean-covered planet e with either 1 bar N 2 + 0.4 bar CO 2, or a 1.3 bar pure CO 2 atmosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/aa693a

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Allard, 2007, A&A, 474, L21, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078362 · DOI
  2. Bitz, 2012, JCli, 25, 3053, 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00290.1 · DOI
  3. Bolmont, 2016, MNRAS, 464, 3728, 10.1093/mnras/stw2578 · DOI
  4. Gillon, 2016, Natur, 533, 221, 10.1038/nature17448 · DOI
  5. Hart, 1979, Icar, 37, 35, 10.1016/0019-1035(79)90141-6 · DOI
  6. Hunten, 1973, JAtS, 30, 1481, 10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<1481:TEOLGF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  7. Koll, 2015, ApJ, 802, 21, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/21 · DOI
  8. Komacek, 2016, ApJ, 832, 54, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/54 · DOI
  9. Kopparapu, 2016, ApJ, 819, 84, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/84 · DOI
  10. Leconte, 2013a, A&A, 554, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321042 · DOI
  11. Leconte, 2013b, Natur, 504, 268, 10.1038/nature12827 · DOI
  12. Luger, 2015, AsBio, 15, 119, 10.1089/ast.2014.1231 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Popp, 2016, NatCo, 7, 10627, 10.1038/ncomms10627 · DOI
  14. Rasch, 1998, JCli, 11, 1587, 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1587:ACOTCM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. Selsis, 2007, A&A, 476, 1373, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078091 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sherwood, 2010, PNAS, 107, 9552, 10.1073/pnas.0913352107 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Shields, 2013, AsBio, 13, 715, 10.1089/ast.2012.0961 · DOI
  18. Terquem, 2007, ApJ, 654, 1110, 10.1086/509497 · DOI
  19. Turbet, 2016, A&A, 596, A112, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629577 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2016, ApJL, 823, L20, 10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L20 · DOI
  21. Wolf, 2017, ApJ, 837, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffc · DOI
  22. Wolf, 2013, AsBio, 13, 1, 10.1089/ast.2012.0936 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wolf, 2014a, GeoRL, 41, 167, 10.1002/2013GL058376 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wolf, 2014b, AsBio, 14, 241, 10.1089/ast.2013.1112 · DOI
  25. Wolf, 2015, JGRD, 120, 5775, 10.1002/2015JD023302 · DOI
  26. Wordsworth, 2013, ApJ, 778, 154, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/154 · DOI
  27. Yang, 2014, ApJL, 787, L2, 10.1088/2041-8205/787/1/L2 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2013, ApJL, 771, L45, 10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L45 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 1995, AtO, 33, 407, 10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wolf, E. T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2017-04-06
Volume
839
Issue
1
Pages
L1
ISSN
  • 2041-8205
  • 2041-8213
Cited by
172
References
5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review