The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International Journal of Molecular Medicine
Abstract
Abstract. Growth factors and/or angiogenic factors are supposed to improve wound healing. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of subcutaneous pretreatment with combinatory proangiogenic factors on wound closure, mechan-ical properties, vessel density and morphology. Twenty-eight Balb/c mice were divided equally into two groups. A mixture of VEGF (35.0 µg), bFGF (2.5 µg) and PdGF (3.5 µg) was administered subcutaneously 3, 5 and 7 days to 14 mice before full thickness skin punch biopsy wounding, whereas 14 control animals received three injections of 0.2 ml saline solution. Wound sizes were assessed daily and the repaired tissues were harvested 7 days after complete wound closure. Complete closure (≥95 % healing of initial wound area) was reached in all proangiogenic pretreated animals on day 10, whereas controls needed 13 days for complete closure. Tensile strengths were nearly twofold higher compared to the controls (p≤0.01). The punch biopsy material revealed 4.2-fold higher vessel densities in the proangiogenic pretreated group. On day 17, the vessel densities in the proangiogenic pretreated wounds were also 3.2-fold higher compared to the untreated controls. No significant differences were seen in the collagen ratio. Pretreatment with proangiogenic factors revealed several significant effects on wound healing: faster time to closure, a higher vessel density and a better functional outcome. These results suggest a beneficial effect of pretreatment with combinatory growth factors in mouse skin wounds without impaired wound healing. This might be exploited in further investigations in diabetic healing as a therapeutic approach for elective surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Singer, A. J., & Clark, R. A. F. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411006 · Cited by 6,106
Cited by
TNF-α in promotion and progression of cancer
Balkwill, F. (2006) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-006-9005-3 · Cited by 915
Metastatic and triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment options
Al-Mahmood, S., Sapiezynski, J., Garbuzenko, O. B., & Minko, T. (2018) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-018-0551-3 · Cited by 524
Nondigestible carbohydrates, butyrate, and butyrate-producing bacteria
Fu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, C., Mou, H., & Kong, Q. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1542587 · Cited by 497
Adipokines as endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine factors in breast cancer risk and progression
Vona-Davis, L., & Rose, D. P. (2007) · Endocrine-Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc-06-0068 · Cited by 496
Brown seaweed fucoidan: Biological activity and apoptosis, growth signaling mechanism in cancer
Senthilkumar, K., Manivasagan, P., Venkatesan, J., & Kim, S.-K. (2013) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.030 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Spandidos Publications
- Published
- 2026-10-12
- ISSN
- 1107-3756 (ISSN-L)
- 1791-244X
- DOI
- 10.3892/ijmm
- OpenAlex
- W4213385752
- Cited by
- 2,246
- References
- 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Journal of Molecular Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3892/ijmm
- The paper
- International Journal of Molecular Medicine. (2026). International Journal of Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.