Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do Winners Repeat?

Goetzmann, William N., Ibbotson, Roger G.·1994·The Journal of Portfolio Management

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Stathmin 1 (STMN1) suppression was reported to reduce cellular viability and migration potential. However, no previous studies have addressed whether STMN1 overexpression is associated with malignant potential in PDAC. Materials and Methods: To clarify the clinical significance of STMN1 in PDAC, the STMN1 expression in 104 PDAC samples was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we evaluated the proliferative potential and migration ability of pancreatic cancer cell line Suit2 cells highly expressing STMN1. Results: Cytoplasmic STMN1 were higher levels in PDAC than in corresponding non-cancerous tissues. PDAC patients with high STMN1 (n=29) were significantly associated with poor differentiation and distant metastasis compared to those with low STMN1 (n=75). The proliferation rates and migration ability in Suit2-STMN1 were higher than those of Suit2-mock. Conclusion: STMN1 evaluation could be a useful progression marker, and STMN1 may be a promising candidate for targeted therapies in PDAC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3905/jpm.1994.9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G.
Venue
The Journal of Portfolio Management
Published
1994-01-31
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
9-18
ISSN
  • 0095-4918 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8656
OpenAlex
W2153599323
Cited by
574
References
0
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Winners Repeat? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3905/jpm.1994.9
The paper
Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G. (1994). Do Winners Repeat? The Journal of Portfolio Management. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1994.9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.