Cited by 80Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Nutrition and Health

The impact of meals on a probiotic during transit through a model of the human upper gastrointestinal tract

Open access
Tompkins, T., Mainville, I., Arcand, Y.·2011·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Commercial literature on various probiotic products suggests that they can be taken before meals, during meals or after meals or even without meals. This has led to serious confusion for the industry and the consumer. The objective of our study was to examine the impact of the time of administration with respect to mealtime and the impact of the buffering capacity of the food on the survival of probiotic microbes during gastrointestinal transit. We used an in vitro Digestive System (IViDiS) model of the upper gastrointestinal tract to examine the survival of a commercial multi-strain probiotic, ProtecFlor®. This product, in a capsule form, contains four different microbes: two lactobacilli ( Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011), Bifidobacterium longum R0175 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii . Enumeration during and after transit of the stomach and duodenal models showed that survival of all the bacteria in the product was best when given with a meal or 30 minutes before a meal (cooked oatmeal with milk). Probiotics given 30 minutes after the meal did not survive in high numbers. Survival in milk with 1% milk fat and oatmeal-milk gruel were significantly better than apple juice or spring water. S. boulardii was not affected by time of meal or the buffering capacity of the meal. The protein content of the meal was probably not as important for the survival of the bacteria as the fat content. We conclude that ideally, non-enteric coated bacterial probiotic products should be taken with or just prior to a meal containing some fats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2011.0022

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the same in vitro study, consumption of the probiotic with 1% milk and oatmeal-milk gruel allowed for higher bacteria survival than with apple juice or spring water.

    “Additionally, this study reported that consumption of the probiotic with 1% milk and oatmeal-milk gruel allowed for higher bacteria survival than when consumed with apple juice or spring water.”
  • In an in vitro digestive model, probiotic consumption 30 min before a meal or with a meal resulted in high bacterial survival, while consumption 30 min after a meal did not.

    “Results of this investigation showed that when a probiotic was consumed 30 min before a meal or with a meal, the bacteria survived in high numbers. Conversely, when the probiotic was taken 30 min after a meal, the bacteria did not survive in high numbers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tompkins, T., Mainville, I., & Arcand, Y.
Affiliations
  • Institut Rosell Inc., 6100 avenue Royalmount, Montreal, H4P 2R2 Quebec, Canada
  • Saint-Hyacinthe Research and Development Centre (CA)
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
295-303
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W1999879328
Cited by
80
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, time of administration, mealtime, gastrointestinal transit, probiotic viability, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces boulardii, milk fat, oatmeal
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Eating, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Colony Count, Microbial, Probiotics, Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review