Cited by 73Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

A higher ratio of beans to white rice is associated with lower cardiometabolic risk factors in Costa Rican adults

Open access
Mattei, Josiemer, Hu, Frank B, Campos, Hannia·2011·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background A high intake of white rice is associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Costa Ricans follow a staple dietary pattern that includes white rice and beans, yet the combined role of these foods on cardiometabolic risk factors has not been studied.Objective We aimed to determine the association between intake of white rice and beans and the metabolic syndrome and its components in Costa Rican adults (n = 1879) without diabetes.Design Multivariate-adjusted means were calculated for components of the metabolic syndrome by daily servings of white rice and beans (<1, 1, or >1) and by the ratio of beans to white rice. The OR for the metabolic syndrome was calculated by substituting one serving of beans for one serving of white rice.Results An increase in daily servings of white rice was positively associated with systolic blood pressure (BP), triglycerides, and fasting glucose and inversely associated with HDL cholesterol (P-trend <0.01 for all). An increase in servings of beans was inversely associated with diastolic BP (P = 0.049). Significant trends for higher HDL cholesterol and lower BP and triglycerides were observed for 1:3, 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 ratios of beans to white rice. Substituting one serving of beans for one serving of white rice was associated with a 35% (95% CI: 15%, 50%) lower risk of the metabolic syndrome.Conclusion Increasing the ratio of beans to white rice, or limiting the intake of white rice by substituting beans, may lower cardiometabolic risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.111.013219

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattei, J., Hu, F. B., & Campos, H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
869-872
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154745621
Cited by
73
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 60692, HL49086, R01HL049086, R01HL060692)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
beans, white rice, metabolic syndrome, cardiometabolic risk factors, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, dietary substitution
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Costa Rica, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Fabaceae, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Oryza, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review