Cited by 23Sodium Intake and HealthNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

Modeling dietary patterns to assess sodium recommendations for nutrient adequacy

Open access
Guenther, Patricia M, Lyon, Joan MG, Appel, Lawrence J·2013·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background The 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report contained dietary patterns developed by using nutrient-dense foods. In most cases, low-sodium forms of foods were incorporated into the patterns.Objectives We wanted to determine whether choosing lower-sodium foods could lower the sodium content to 1500 mg without compromising nutrient adequacy. We also explored the effect of choosing typical foods (more calories with higher sodium) and the feasibility of implementing sodium recommendations on a density basis (mg Na/kcal).Design Food patterns developed during the 2010 Dietary Guidelines development process were used as the base for this analysis. Modeling was then used to analyze the effect of substituting lower-sodium foods on nutrient adequacy.Results Sodium amounts in the base model varied directly with energy level (1.0 mg Na/kcal) and ranged from 996 to 3176 mg/d. Amounts in the lowest-sodium model also varied with energy level (~0.5 mg/kcal) and ranged from 500 to 1250 mg/d. A comparison of sodium density for the base and the lowest sodium models showed that sodium in the lowest model is ~50% of the base. For typical food choices, sodium amounts were much higher (1.6-2.0 mg/kcal and 1715-5078 mg/d). Comparison of sodium density for the base and the typical food choice models showed that amounts were 1.6-2.0 times greater than the base.Conclusions By choosing only low-sodium foods, it was possible to construct nutritionally adequate dietary patterns with 1500 mg Na/d. Sodium density (mg Na/kcal) is a practical approach for expressing sodium recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.112.047779

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guenther, P. M., Lyon, J. M., & Appel, L. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
842-847
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143816350
Cited by
23
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
dietary sodium, low-sodium foods, nutritional adequacy, sodium density, dietary habits, energy intake, sodium intake, dietary substitution
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Models, Biological, Nutritive Value, Sodium, Sodium, Dietary, Guidelines as Topic, Nutrition Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review